You mean Seth didn't have to have sex with his sisters to propagate the human race?  Thank god my name can finally be cleared now.

Hahaha

That is a matter of opinion, maybe they do, maybe they don't.

By the same logic, nazis that DID NOT take part in massacres or killings of anyone should not be considered as having any responsibility in the events of WW2.

In my opinion they DO have a responsibility. NOT the same level of responsibility as those having committed the crimes but they still have chosen to follow a political system that is responsible for committing heinous crimes.

Though in the public opinion NOBODY speaks of making a difference between nazis that committed crimes and those who did not. This is so much so that I sometimes hear people say "During WW2 The Germans did this and the Germans did that" which COULD be considered racist as not all Germans were nazis.

The point is nazism is nazism and while I believe a nazi that never killed anyone should not be held directly accountable for the crimes of the others, such nazi still chose to follow that political vision that led to the horrible crimes we all know about.

That is not an opinion and I suggest you do research. You seem to not be able to tell the difference between a terrorist group which has operations in different places and a state government. Terrorist groups are organizations. If there were not people in islamic countries fighting against terrorist organizations. I think the issue you're having is not being able to tell the difference between a terrorist organization and a religious faith that is akin to christianity and judaism because they all follow the same god and the same prophet. They problem they all have is that they have some altered interpretations based on time of composition and they all have seen their main prophet or messiah of choice or are still waiting . So essentially, religiously, they are cousins under the family tree of abrahamic religions. Nazi's were a poltiical party who ran a whole nation, there is a difference. 

His ideas were mostly based on race, rather than religion. So yeah, it was certainly racist.

What???

Could you please not obfuscate the issue? It's complex enough as it is without obfuscating.

OF COURSE Hitler was racist, where did you see me say Hitler was not?

What a nice fellow that you are. Do you lose it every time someone stands up to your PC spiel or are you making an exception for me?

No need to reply, my question was rhetorical.

We finally agree on something: To be done with each other.

You logical fallacies don't work on me.  1.8 billion people are not defined by the actions of a few who claim ownership of an IDEA that is NOT theirs.  You know, the religion itself.  Secondly, NO ONE asked you to defend anyone's crimes.  Your problem is conflating crimes of people who claim to follow Islam as 'Islam's crimes'.  You are so utterly lost. I remember think like you.  When the guy in Texas burst into the church and killed all of those people, we say that that man is the criminal, not white me, or Christian men.  His actions don't define the belief system of 2.2 billion Christians or all white men.  NOW: take that simple idea and apply it to this.  Wake up.  Extremists don't form religions, they find already established ones and use those to 'justify' their actions. 

AGAIN in what universe did you hear me defend the Bible? And what gave you the idea that I'm christian?

I'm an atheist and a freethinker.

And yes the bible is vicious and ruthless in some parts and it contradicts itself too. For example: God loves us all but if we don't blindly follow his commands like good little brainwashed drones, we will burn in hell for ever... but he LOVES US (as George Carlin said in such a smart way) or better yet, Genesis: Adam and Eve were punished and banished from Eden because they ate an apple they were forbidden to eat. What kind of stupid God does not want people to eat a specific apple and can't think of anything better than to put that tree in front of their noses? And when I read that a long time ago and found out that the apple represented knowledge and not eating it represented what they call "innocence" which I call by its real name: IGNORANCE, I was like: why does a so called loving God want his children to be ignorant? Makes no sense to me... Long story short I am not one to fall for all that nonsense, don't worry.

To me Jesus was a political agitator of his time, a guy that started some kind of socio-political movement and he made the mistake of brushing against the powers of the time and he ended up condemned to death because of that. It's the church who some 300 years later decided among all the people in the past that that guy called Jesus should be their mascot, the son of God. It suited the church and the political context of their time to name Jesus as their savior.

The major difference between Nazi Germany and the current Islam is that the Islam doesn't have a big unified state with a government that supports the execution of their ideology. If ISIS wasn't opposed so strongly by everyone else, they could easily have established a state where most people support them (and the few who don't, get oppressed, just like in Nazi Germany).

By the way, they do have a fair amount of supporters: