ironmanDX said:
thismeintiel said:
Might want to check your memory there, buddy. Pro was not announced at E3. Sony had their own little conference in Sept to announce the Pro. Then, two months later it was launched. And many doesn't mean all. It doesn't even have to mean a majority. The point still stands. The leap from PS4 to Pro was smaller, and deemed less necessary, by gamers and the company that made it. MS, on the other hand, advertised it like the next revolution in gaming was here.
|
Hmm, yeah. My memory did fail me there. I blame it on your Hulk Kazogan avy. I fear that leg drop.
I didn't say or imply all. Surely though, if the pro was constrained and had little hype the "many" and "disgruntled" xbox one owners would have been able to hit a higher target then 600k especially so if Microsoft did in fact drum up the xbox one x as the next revolution in gaming? Surely? Or was it just a upgraded xbox one just like they said it was?
You can't have your cake and eat it too. They're both more expansive upgrades of existing hardware using the same software, play the same games and use the same accessories as their respective predecessors. If we can't compare them with each other then where does it end? Not comparing xbox one and ps4 with the Switch because it's a hybrid? Hell no. (Not that you're saying that but it does set precedence) The comparison is valid.
|
We absolutely can (and should) compare the Pro and X1X, but it's fair to say that there are currently significant limits to the conclusions that we can pull from those comparisons. The Pro was given much less build up (it only had a few months in the spotlight before launch, compared to a multi-stage reveal across 1.5~ years for the X1X), its initial shipments appear to have been relatively limited (it sold out in various places despite what seem to be fairly tame launch numbers), and Sony were pretty careful with how they marketed the Pro (i assume so as not to alienate current PS4 owners). Saying MS marketed the X1X as the "next revolution in gaming " is hyperbolic in my opinion, but they certainly pushed it harder than Sony did the Pro. Why wouldn't they? They're risking a higher price and later release, while also playing from behind. They have a lot more to gain from the X1X than Sony did the Pro.
On the other hand, we also have to consider that the X1X has faced considerably more competition than the Pro did. Even ignoring the Switch (which so far seems to be operating in its own bubble), the X1X is competing against some seriously good PS4 and X1 deals, and the Pro at $350 + a game. The latter is particularly substantial because even if someone is 100% neutral on owning either an X1 or PS4, and they wanted the better versions, they then have to value the X1X's power advantage at $150 - $200 (the price of an X1 or PS4).
As things stand i don't think we have enough information to be able to weight any of these factors. Hell, this thread itself is discussing a prediction. I personally hope the X1X does do better, at minimum on a ratio level. I'm fairly happy with my Pro, and unfortunately i'll never own an X1X for a variety of reasons, but i think the X1X is a much better approach to mid-gen upgrades. It doing well will hopefully encourage Sony to follow that approach in the future.