Shaunodon said:
At the time I felt 'great' was reasonably interchangeable with 'ideal', but that's just my small mistake. It's not the same as the difference between great, and not successful at all. I'm not sure what narrative you think I'm trying to push. Their tweets speak for themselves. They're the ones showing the overwhelming enthusiasm for Switch.
"-Probably other platforms will get these too as part of multi, but we would aggressively make games for Switch" |
Yep they are excited and will push for games on Switch, some may be exclusives, no problem on that And they considering Switch ideal for some type of SW is good, but you pushed on the others, but no worries.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."