They're owned by Activison

No, there's a reason the company is called "Activision Blizzard" and not just "Activision".

To each their own. I understand. There are people who dont care what the publisher does, and thats not neccessarily wrong.

Anyways, by Activision I mean only  the Activision side, not blizzard. I dont want Overwatch to get ruined.

Ow that's interesting. What is the nuance in that situation?

It's because of the WWII setting. It's just better. It's also the reason why I've been interested in a new CoD since like forever. Not interested enough to get this at full price when I know it'll drop in price mere weeks from now, but we'll see.

COD Reviews are ALWAYS good, guys. Tell me a COD game that didn't got excellent scores, even that trash can of Infinite Warfare took lot of 8.5 and some 9.3 too

It's the intelligence of us players to recognize that this games are no worth our money that we should use to buy other (much greater) games, done by software houses that usually sells so poorly that they close.

How many software houses had to close their door in the last 5 years after having done great games that nobody cares about? The problem with the industry is that 90% of console users but only COD, Fifa, Assassin's Creed and GTA, ignoring all the rest. If you check sales data here on VGChartz you can clearly see this, lot of money expended on a really small range of titles, always the same titles, and really nothing left for other games.

I run a videogame shop and I can tell you taht about 85% of players spent their money in 1 or 2-3 titles every year (same titles every year) and then lot of euros on season pass of this titles, and worstly, thousands of euros on FIfa Ultimate Team, and totally ignoring all other great games that comes out for their console.

COD is one of this titles, reviews are always great (Activision is clearly paying for those votes) but the game is always really really ugly, always the same, year after year, It's now ridicoulous this situation.

Is this really a surprise? Activision has the review industry by the balls except for a select few, especially when it comes to their most profitable IP. Activision could come up with the next COD being as polished as The History Channels games, and reviewers would say "it has some minor hiccups here and there, but ultimately it is the same COD we know and love."

Well, it's a big AAA game, so it has to be above 80. It's also not a 1st party game, so it has to be below 90.

COD WWII above spla2n, mario + rabbids, and nearly on the level of nier automata, horizon zero dawn, and Samus Returns??????

the CoD series has always been one of the best FPS series period.

Not one game has been objectively bad and if you've played a few FPS in your life you should know that.

Most people are just salty that their favourite game series are being abandoned because of lacklustre sales and then blame a good and popular series for it instead of the people who won't buy anything other than that.