Awesome week for Switch.

That's all I was trying to say. People want to play as their favorites characters. Games with such a wide cast are far more suited to this type of game than a series that has a handful of memorable characters.

You misunderstand me. I said that FE would be more appealing as a Musou title. Not that it was any closer gameplay wise. Fire Emblem's widened appeal almost entirely due to the characters and art of the new games. The target audience of the two games is quite different, so I don't think it's a reach to expect that a more niche/enthusiast crowd would be interested in this type of spin off.

Soooooooo...

Where is Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite? Should Capcom seriously consider pulling support for Sony hardware at this point?

I mean, I see people saying EA will be pulling support for Switch so it seems fair to ask this question.

I see it. I think Fire Emblem Warriors could have been way more successful had it appealed to a broader FE audience(mainly in the west though). It's almost entirely a Fates/Awakening game when the fact is that Fire Emblem is a series where the fanbase is fairly split. It's simply a series where each entry specializes at certain things and there is a niche for each game. It's not like most franchises where the sequels are homogeneous and the fans pretty much just think of the games as one complete timeline. It's a series split between different themes, characters, and events. It's one of those franchises that really excels because of how different each game represents itself. 

FE Warriors is simply way more poinent as a concept than Hyrule Warriors. Especially because A ) how much it changes up the Musuo formula and B ) It is based on a franchise entirely about characters

Oh, it's a shame that Trails of Cold Steel 3 couldn't do 100k. DQXI on PS4 isn't in the top 20 anymore.
Dat Switch slayage, it did more than the others combined.

Poor ARMS. :(
I wished it had better legs

So, does that mean that the stock issue is over worldwide?

Nintendo franchises in general are more split than your average one because they are about representing different themes from entry to entry. That being said, Fire Emblem is more character based so making a Musuo game out of it makes a lot more sense. To say that the older NES/SNES games have bland characters it to criticize most games at that time. How about every game from the GBA onward?

Zelda has iconic characters, but they are few and far between, and not as meaningful. I think Link, Zelda, and Ganandorf are about as iconic as it gets. Maayyybbee Midna and Tingle?Of course, any Zelda game will be more iconic than a Fire Emblem one . But Musuo games are fan service, and asking which game is more suited for it is kind of like asking would you rather play a game fighting along side characters with actual arcs, depth(well...), characters who litera lly come out of a war environment, and personalities... or a few iconic designs that are nothing more than cardboard archetypes for a series that was never about plot to begin with. Of course, FE has bad characters and LOZ has some great ones, but the two series have a huge disparity in character importance. 

It's just an opinion..Rol...

I think you know what I meant, lol. 

Someone in Japan should confirm this. But I think its still selling every stock they have. Once the loterries dissappear  then it should be good. 

Are they still holding lotteries? It seems that Amazon JP has stock but I can't read Japanese so not sure.