tbone51 said:
I convinced my non gamer friend to invest to at the time lol. I did $500ish and he did $1000. (Yes baby steps). I wish i put more.... So i gues 26shares and he dis 52shares. |
Its better than nothing, I wanted long time to invest in Nintendo stocks.
Kerotan said:
I could invest 50k right now I I wanted. But I consider that a bad investment. It might peak this year or early next year and then continually drop for years.
It might not but there's a high risk when it's so inflated. |
You have that kind of money? Wow! That said its not going to peak this year so scratch that and if switch continues to sell like a powerhouse then it wont peak next year as well. The system doesnt even have the biggest sellers yet. Mario 3d and zelda are already aiming to hit the top of their franchises, there could potientially be others. Hell i say even pokemon has a shot (if done right) to surpass 20mil again which hasnt been seen in almost 2 decades (was close though in 07/08).
Youll regret it (if you were able to) later
megaman79 said:
Atleast in this case, its largely Japanese that are speculating. NTDOY is a parcel of the Nikkei traded stock. Id trust Japanese stock speculators more than the bulls and bullshit tech bloggers on Wall street. |
That much I would have to agree, even more because japanese are more conservative and less speculative. Also look forward to the future of the company and country instead of short term gain
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
That much I would have to agree, even more because japanese are more conservative and less speculative. Also look forward to the future of the company and country instead of short term gain |
Out of curiosity, what on earth do you do with your savings if you don't put them in stocks? Do you just let them sit in the bank, watching the real value of them decrease? Buy bonds at like 2% interest, also there achieving just a net 0% change in real value?
Also, in the post you quoted, we can literally see how you complained about investors being speculative by looking towards the future, and now you applaud the Japanese for being less speculative by looking at the future instead of the short term. I can't wrap my head around how that makes sense...
Last edited by Teeqoz - on 27 November 2017
Teeqoz said:
Out of curiosity, what on earth do you do with your savings if you don't put them in stocks? Do you just let them sit in the bank, watching the real value of them decrease? Buy bonds at like 2% interest, also there achieving just a net 0% change in real value? Also, in the post you quoted, we can literally see how you complained about investors being speculative by looking towards the future, and now you applaud the Japanese for being less speculative by looking at the future instead of the short term. I can't wrap my head around how that makes sense... |
In Brazil, government debts earn you about 5% above inflation (which in some years can mean 20% interest).
But if I where to have enough money and no real good and save investments I would make a business to grow my money.
Errrr you probably understood wrong... the USA market is speculative because the don't really look at the future (because that isn't speculation, that is forecasting) they are speculative because they aren't very much married with the future and present of the company. How can anyone believe an investor is really looking at the next five years of a company if they buy and sell the share within couple hours?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Neck and Neck between Nintendo and Sony's market cap
US Dollars
Sony 60.52 Billion http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3ASNE&ei=gJ4cWsnQB86O0QTX96OYCQ
Nintendo 59.56 Billion http://finance.google.com/finance?q=OTCMKTS:NTDOY
| GProgrammer said: Neck and Neck between Nintendo and Sony's market cap |
From what we were hearing here Nintendo was well above Sony, any recent fluctuation?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Funny thing is that Sony Computer Entertainment is actually making more money than Nintendo. The reason Sony is smaller is because the rest of the company is bleeding money.
Anyone that thinks Nintendo stock has peaked already is dumb. Hell, the holiday quarter results are still far away from being posted.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
