By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

 

A pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

Avoid loss of human lives at all costs! 128 28.64%
 
NK will never use those w... 147 32.89%
 
We should stop them befor... 71 15.88%
 
We should stop NK before NK causes a tragedy. 101 22.60%
 
Total:447
Bajablo on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

I agree, but I don't agree to this option.

Right now it's them or us. For too long they've been practically putting a gun to our head and bragging about how they're going to pull the trigger.

A pre-emptive strike on those nuclear communist pigs is self-defense. Just make sure to hit fatass himself first.

almost wish their nuke hits you first then..
it seems like you don't understand how f*cking dead everything becomes, but i guess you have a love for bombs.. since you are CaptainExplosion
bombs is love bombs is life?



3DS FC# 4553-9947-9017 NNID: Bajablo

Torn-City - MMO text based RPG, join me! :)

Around the Network
konnichiwa on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
Ka-pi96 said:

I guess the enemy is in Canada then!

Are you fucking serious?

Zkuq said:

South Korea and possibly Japan would take most of the damage caused by the war - a war started by the US, mainly because of its own foreign interests. There's no need to do anything because North Korea isn't going to do anything unprovoked. The moment North Korea uses a nuclear weapon, the regime is done for. North Korea can use a nuclear weapon only as a deterrent and nothing else. As much as North Korea sucks, it's not much of a threat. It might become one to South Korea if South Korea is left to stand alone, but right now, it's not happening.

Trust me, they will.

The USSR will attack us, Trust me they will.






VGPolyglot on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
konnichiwa said:

The USSR will attack us, Trust me they will.

They would have if survived long enough to have the opportunity.

Guess what? The USSR never attacked. No point doing what-ifs, the reality is that it never happened. And North Korea is nowhere near the military power that the Soviet Union was.



DonFerrari on 04 September 2017
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:

You know that this is bullocks right? On war the one that lose will always be the war criminal to be judged doesn't matter what each side done or who started.

Funny because Iraq lost and everyone involved has been a villain of that since, Blair, Bush etc... This isn't the dark ages where you write your own history any more the whole world is more aware of shit going on.

Blair has desperately rallied against Corbyn despite being the same party because the latter said a wrongful invasion requires a war crime trial.

Villain? Perhaps... have any of them be executed or gone to trial? Nope.

Have any of NATO higher ups gone for trial over Kosovo mistakes? Nope.

Have USA and allies commited similar crimes to Germany and Japan? Yes. Have any of their officials gone to the same trials nazi guys gone? Nope. Part of losing the war and signing the rendition is accepting that you are in a way or another the one in the wrong.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

VGPolyglot on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

Guess what? The USSR never attacked. No point doing what-ifs, the reality is that it never happened. And North Korea is nowhere near the military power that the Soviet Union was.

They still have the USSR's resilience and psychotic desire to kill us for no reason, which are enough on their own.

That just seems like an excuse to kill many of them, because it'd be considered more acceptable to kill them if that were true.



Around the Network
VGPolyglot on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

That just seems like an excuse to kill many of them, because it'd be considered more acceptable to kill them if that were true.

Of course it's true. They share their fat manbaby's ideals and want to destroy us because he wants to.

Maybe you should do more research on North Korea. Yes, the regime is horrible, but you're dehumanising many people who are just average people trying to live out their lives.



SegataSanshiro on 04 September 2017

No, too many innocent lives are at stake. The people who live there are spied on as their phone calls and such are all monitored. Thier electronics are well over 20 years old. They are fed constant propaganda. They are required to have a picture of their dictator in their homes. If we can save them it would be a revelation to them as they would feel they just got out of a cult. Those people are innocent.

 

If you don't think they are innocent. This is the kinda of stuff they are shown.



dyremose on 04 September 2017

No.. China just needs to stop trading with them.. This is a country that is in no way self reliant and with the only one bringing them the resources and things they need, the best way to hurt them is to cut off that arterie. This will have 2 possible scenarios.. Either forcing NK to attack or to come to terms with the UN. Kim only has one goal and that is to stay in power and maintain it, and attacking would be suicide for him. No country can stay stable without any sort of trade and especially if it's a country with a shortage of fertile land to provide the basic necessities of its population. I think kim fears a peasants revolt if he cannot provide food for his people and so would see that the best way to resolve a complete isolation from the world would be to extend the olive branch... China is the key to solving this.



Zkuq on 04 September 2017
CaptainExplosion said:
Zkuq said:

South Korea and possibly Japan would take most of the damage caused by the war - a war started by the US, mainly because of its own foreign interests. There's no need to do anything because North Korea isn't going to do anything unprovoked. The moment North Korea uses a nuclear weapon, the regime is done for. North Korea can use a nuclear weapon only as a deterrent and nothing else. As much as North Korea sucks, it's not much of a threat. It might become one to South Korea if South Korea is left to stand alone, but right now, it's not happening.

Trust me, they will.

Oh really? And why would they do that? I'm not going to just trust someone that doesn't even try to give reasons for his views



LMU Uncle Alfred on 04 September 2017

I think NK could have already done it a long time ago tbh.



Lube Me Up