Doesn't matter if it is East or West. The bulk of games on the Playstation is on PC.
Japanese developers are also taking notice and releasing more of their games on PC these days, so your argument is moot.
I am amazed at how many people are getting defensive over this, this happened last console generation as well you know.

And I agree. The Xbox *is* redundant if you own a PC and you only care about games.
The Playstation you can also live without if you own a PC, but there are more gems that can draw you in, which is ultimately the big difference between Xbox and Playstation.

Regardless. If you are truly a passionate gamer and love games, you will own all the platforms and not be strictly stuck to one, these are multi-billion dollar companies, you don't owe them anything.

The platforms are under the brands unbrella. It holds true regardless of platform. So pick and choose. I don't care.

We cannot forget either that the Original Xbox took advantage of the PC's vast library and had some pretty good console exclusive titles like... The Elder Scrolls: Morrowind. Which is also playable on the Xbox 360 via emulation. (And I would assume, eventually Xbox One.)

Morrowind was amazing, sad that Gamecube and Playstation 2 gamers missed out on probably one of the best games of that entire generation.

With that, the Original Xbox shared the bulk of it's library with the PC. There was no real reason to own the Original Xbox as a PC gamer.
And yet... I still got one. - I still have it actually.

To me it's not about saitisfaction it's about having more good games. The PS4 exclusives aren't great to me because no one else has them they're great because they are good games and I have the only console that can play that game. I also have the ability to play the other great multiplat games.

I agree with TS that multiplats is the  best solution everyone should get the chance to play these games. We don't though so if I have to choose I'll choose PS4. TS is basicalyl saying MS should be praised for having less good games avaliable to their consumers.

One of the main problems here is that MS Play Anywhere program doesn't work like it should be. You still have a lot of differences between XB1 and PC versions of games. The majority of PA games doesn't have cross-play or cross-save. So, what's good in splitting the userbase between two platforms. When the program was announced it sounded good in theory but MS seems to have failed to achieve what they were expected to. Also, they release some games on Steam and this versions doesn't use XBL for online play at all splitting user base even further. Now between three different platforms. I think that people doesn't praise them because it all looks like MS is just being desperate for a quick buck instead of thinking about the future of their gaming platform.

Again, exclusive games are the most important aspect of what distinguishes each console from eachother because well... the point of consoles is to play video games. Desirable exclusive games are a major draw of gamers. Third party games help fill in the gaps between exclusives and they add further to a console's library but they are not the true draw to one particular console over another when they can play the same 3rd party games. The wii u's exclusive offerings sucked donkey balls and it sales reflected that. It's games and marketing were too focused on the smallest demographic of gamers. Having exclusives just for the sake of having them doesn't count for much with gamers. 

That last point of yours is just bonkers. How is "X1 games not being playable on PC AT ALL, is worse" when xbox fans can just play the games on the X1 and pc gamers won't touch the games on win 10 because they can't be modded? It defeats the point of the feature to consumers. 

Who really cares if X1 games are playable on win 10 or not. MS is only putting xbox exclusives on win 10 to draw more ppl to using windows store on win 10. It's in vain though because the consumers they're trying to convince are knowledgeable on this stuff.