Your rules sound like people are only allowed to start threads if they have nothing else to do in their life, looking at rule 1, 2 and 5 espacially
You can complain all you want, but nothing will change 
that's the unfortunate truth, but is what it is.
RolStoppable said:
Moderations start at warnings where people get officially told what they shouldn't do. Some of the poor conduct would still require repeat offenses to justify the first official warning, but the moderation tools in and of themselves are not a problem. |
I know there's warnings, I'm mainly worried about all warnings being treated as equals. It's especially bad if there's a system for automatically banning users with enough warnings (I don't know if there's one here). It'd be quite flexible if each user had a warning level, from 0 too 100 for example, and they could be warned with any number of points from 0 to 100. Lesser offenses would be worth less points, bigger offenses worth more. It would be quite flexible. Of course I don't think it's going to happen here, but it's a thought anyway.
| Ruler said: Your rules sound like people are only allowed to start threads if they have nothing else to do in their life, looking at rule 1, 2 and 5 espacially |
Don't you think you're exaggerating by quite a bit? The first point doesn't require all that much effort, the second point takes almost no extra effort at all, and the fifth point is there to ensure that if you're going to make wild claims, you're also going to defend them. In normal situations, the fifth point wouldn't have much use.
| StarOcean said: You can complain all you want, but nothing will change |
This is the moderator I voted for.
Seriously, If anybody want to improve anything on this forum, lets check vivster's post history first.
Also on emore thing - Moderation team is very inconsistent already, no need to further "improve" it :P
| StarOcean said: You can complain all you want, but nothing will change that's the unfortunate truth, but is what it is. |
Ahh, is this some insider knowledge that you're giving us?
| Ruler said: Your rules sound like people are only allowed to start threads if they have nothing else to do in their life, looking at rule 1, 2 and 5 espacially |
Sounds like a good thing to me.
And again, those aren't my rules. Those rules have existed since the beginning of the internet. VGC is one of the very few forums that so far has not acknowledged their existence.
If people just want to blurt their opinion out into the open world there's Twitter and Facebook. This is a forum that at least officially exists to encourage discussion. A good discussion is nurtured by a high quality opener.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
| John2290 said: Ya, sure. If you want to kill the site or make a big dent in revenue this is a great set of ideas. |
I like those rules even more, seeing how their biggest offenders are so against them.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.
tagging for a read later.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
RolStoppable said:
There's no system for automatic bans. All kinds of moderations allow the mod team to write descriptive and comprehensive notes for the type of violation that was committed. The different types of violations are treated separately, so for example, spam doesn't stack with trolling. |
Ah, I see. Thanks for the information. I wouldn't know since I've never been on either side of moderation.
| Versus_Evil said: Just ban all Barney/Ruler/Snoopy/Kazuma/Nintation/Living metal threads = problem solved. |
Hey. That's "LivingMetal" mind you. 
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
