Before this goes too far, I feel the need to point out a number of problematic assertions with the OP (and the links cited there and in the following posts).

Yes, methane is far more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide (a whopping 84 times as effective, according to the EDF). But what's ignored in the articles is that methane dissipates MUCH faster than carbon dioxide. Whereas methane takes roughly a decade of exposure to Earth's atmosphere before it disappears, CO2 will take thousands of years before it dissipates (all according to EPA estimates). Much of this is due to the fact that methane breaks down quickly in Earth's (and other planets') atmosphere, whereas essentially the only way on Earth that CO2 can be removed from the atmosphere is by plants. As a result of this, the effect of methane on global warming is only 28% that of CO2. Which is still significant, but by no means the "true" or "main" cause of global warming.

Additionally, methane is not going ignored. The UN released a (now skeptically viewed) report in 2006 claiming that methane from cows was doing greater damage to the environment than CO2, which prompted much of the researched I mentioned above. A good deal of climate study in the late 2000s was devoted to how much methane was affecting global warming; might be worth a look.

Actually, they did that after concerned people called them after watching Cowspiracy.

Just recently, Greenpeace added a page to their website entitled, “More Meat Threatens the Planet”, where they write,

More and more of our supporters are telling us they are really concerned about the impact the world's obsession with meat is having on the environment, climate change in particular.

http://www.cowspiracy.com/blog/2015/10/1/these-environmental-groups-need-a-wake-up-call-sound-the-alarm

Yeah after being pressured. In the docu itself no group would even acknowledge the issue or downplay it.

Like someone already said I hope you are being sarcastic.  If you are this is some Onion worthy marterial.

With carcinogenics, heart disease, deforestation, water shortage and global fart warming, I better enjoy as many burgers while I can before meat eaters become as outcast as smokers. I just had 2 nice juicy home bbq'd burgers. I should eat a lot more burgers cause we're still mostly below historical average temperatures!

It all balances out. Warm longer, I'll cycle more instead of taking the car, spends more time outside instead of watching tv / playing video games and no need for heating the house. Just need the airco to run of solar panels and we're all set.

Islam banned the wrong kind of meat.

Yeah, well, timezone ARE annoying. I support your suggestion and say: SvennoJ for President!

Hinduism got it right!

Kill all the cows! Force the price of eye fillet down to $1 a kilo. I'll buy a life supply and be helping the environment.

I want to assume this is sarcasm but I'm having a hard time because the claim that current global warming is due to the sun is not a new claim.

Yes it is. Solar output variety is on an 11 year cycle while global warming keeps increasing. Ofcourse humans will cling onto anything when the opposite is complicated to understand and any slowdown of global warming during the downward spiral of solar activity is seen as proof it must all be a hoax. Just as looking for one easy thing to blame it all on, eg cattle or China, looking for one little thing to dispute it all is equally popular.

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/effect-of-sun-on-climate-faq.html#.WTQQt9y1thE
What we can do is nuke major volcanoes to spew tons of reflective particles in the atmosphere. That should provide plenty of cool fireworks in 4K coverage as well as getting rid of the damn things. It's not called nuclear winter for nothing after all :) /notserious however as an extreme comic book solution it would work!