By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Sony going third party is an excellent idea for gamers.

Tagged games:

 

Do you agree?

Yes, I find it reasonable. 186 37.73%
 
No, I find it is a stupid idea. 307 62.27%
 
Total:493
Pavolink on 21 April 2017
Trunkin said:

The biggest advantage of Sony going third party would be  that all of the third party exclusives they're holding hostage right now could be made available on more systems.

Indeed.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Around the Network
GoOnKid on 21 April 2017
Pavolink said:

Indeed.

So, about that petition thingy. Are we doing this or what?



xl-klaudkil on 21 April 2017

True, and soo is with Nintendo and Microsoft.
In a perfect world we would have 1 unified console and pc.

In a perfect world we won't have borders or countries.
Noo rich and poor and noo wars.
Noo racisme and noo hate.

But we don't live in a perfect world far from it.

Soo noo won't happen.



 

My youtube gaming page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/klaudkil

FunFan on 21 April 2017
GoOnKid said:
Pavolink said:

Indeed.

So, about that petition thingy. Are we doing this or what?

Great idea, get on it.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

Mandalore76 on 21 April 2017
xl-klaudkil said:
True, and soo is with Nintendo and Microsoft.
In a perfect world we would have 1 unified console and pc.
In a perfect world we won't have borders or countries.
Noo rich and poor and noo wars.
Noo racisme and noo hate.

But we don't live in a perfect world far from it.

Soo noo won't happen.

How is zero options for the consumer "a perfect world"?  One unified console means no experimentation, no choice of different experiences.  Taking away the freedom of choice from the consumer has never resulted in a more "perfect world".



Around the Network
outlawauron on 21 April 2017
CGI-Quality said:
outlawauron said:

That's pretty much semantics. PS is the pillar of the company at the moment. It won't always be more profitable than their financial services division, but it's the global face of the company.

'Global Face Of The Company' (which I think is a bit of hyperbole, anyway) doesn't mean they're only existing because of it. It's not about semantics, rather, common sense. If the other divisions rake in more money, then PlayStation can't be the only reason they're afloat.

Is it though? Two of the most profitable divisions are Games and Network Services and their Financial Services groups. The latter is not a global team. So, by near default the most successful and impactful department for Sony is Games and Network Services. It's carrying the torch for the company while they continue to tweak and redo the others. 

That's not to say that with games, Sony would be gone, but they'd be far less influential in the global tech market.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.