By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - US launches missiles at Syrian Base following chemical attack

The USA is a one-nation Nation destroying machine. How many casualties have there been. Let's see off the top of my head- Afgahginstan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, tried to do it to Iran and Pakistan, Saudi Arabia pays them money then there's Palestine and Egypt, once tried to do it to the Philippines.Wait a minute, all the screwy middle eastern countries were once unscrewy and all of them have been screwed over by USA. The only common thing between these nations and people is that the nations were all created by the british drawing stupid lines on a map and the USA carrying out something in them and toppling their governments or trying to somehow. So those self-righteous English and Amercan bastards are at fault as well. Something most of the world already knew of course. And what's the one thing common between the British then and Americans now. They thought they were better than everybody else and forced their way through the military power to screw other people over. The stupid manifest destiny nonsense and now the American Republic going around teaching democracy in Africa and Asia.



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Around the Network

The chemical attack is rubbish. The plan all along was to topple Syrians legitimate government, this is merely an excuse. 

 

Why was there no such strikes against isis and all other animal groups fighting? 

 

It's clear to me these dirty rebel animals have been armed from the offset, any time Syrian government makes victories against isis and the rest of the filth all of a sudden mysterious airstrips happen I don't get it. 

 

They will have to play their game well as Iraq lybia etc were ground down to failed states because of actions like this. As far as I'm concerned the west are backing the terrorists to use as a destabilising force they need to be eliminated. 

 

I wish victory for Syria and not the filth terror groups that are helping destroy it. 



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Johnw1104 said:
Mystro-Sama said:
Wonder if the chemical attacks were a false flag.

I might think that possible if Russia's response hadn't been exactly that of a kid stammering for a poor excuse when caught in a lie.

I don't know why or how it happened, but their explanation was ridiculous. Given Russia has never had a problem throwing conspiracies and accusations at the west, I have to think they must know that it was a Syrian ally.

Why should Assad use chemicals if he was winning at the moment? And why come up with Russia now if it wasnt mentioned it in his post?



Peh said:
Soundwave said:

 

 

lol

Ladies and Gentleman, the so called President of the United States.

I really doubt the US is a democracy at this point, you can have who ever you want the policies are exactly the same.



Skeeuk said:

The chemical attack is rubbish. The plan all along was to topple Syrians legitimate government, this is merely an excuse. 

 

Why was there no such strikes against isis and all other animal groups fighting? 

 

It's clear to me these dirty rebel animals have been armed from the offset, any time Syrian government makes victories against isis and the rest of the filth all of a sudden mysterious airstrips happen I don't get it. 

 

They will have to play their game well as Iraq lybia etc were ground down to failed states because of actions like this. As far as I'm concerned the west are backing the terrorists to use as a destabilising force they need to be eliminated. 

 

I wish victory for Syria and not the filth terror groups that are helping destroy it. 

McCain needs to die, there's no other way.



Around the Network

American has never been a democracy.  The majority never rules here.  Its a republic for that exact reason.



ArnoldRimmer said:

Anyone remember the chemical attack in 2013?
Just a reminder for those who may have forgotten, or only know the half-truth that the mass media spread back then:

In EARLY 2013, there seems to have been an attack with chemical weapons (probably Sarin) in Syria. You may not have heard about it, because the western mass media hardly even reported about it.

In response to that incident, the syrian government themself requested the UN to send in chemical weapons experts that should investigate the incident. Their motivation for doing so is easy to understand and quite obvious: They were absolutely convinced that it was the terrorists ("rebels" in western mass-media language) who were illegally using chemical weapons; and being aware that the western mass-media would not believe their own words anyway, they wanted neutral chemical weapons experts from a UN institution to prove that the terrorists were illegally using chemical weapons, knowing that the western mass-media could not simply dismiss the investigation results of neutral UN experts.

But their request at the UN for sending in neutral chemical weapons experts was blocked, or at least extremely delayed, for MONTHS. Which is quite ridiculous in itself, because the longer one waits after a chemical weapons attack, the more impossible it is to investigate the incident and to prove anything.

Then, finally, MONTHS after the syrian government requested the UN experts, their request was finally approved - but with one severe restriction: The chemical weapons experts were strictly forbidden to investigate or even comment on who was responsible for the chemical weapons attack, they were only allowed to investigate IF chemicals weapons had been used.

So in late 2013, the UN/OPCW chemical weapons experts that the syrian government themselves invited, finally arrived, in order to investigate the use of chemical weapons earlier that year, which was almost impossible due to the long time that had passed since.
But strangely, just two or three days after those chemical weapons experts arrived, a new chemical weapons attack happened in Syria (Ghouta) - which western mass-media instantly blamed on the syrian government.

So the UN experts investigated that incident as well, came to the obvious conclusion that anyone already knew (that chemical weapons had indeed been used), but were still strictly forbidden to investigate who was responsible for the incident. What a strange coincidence...

So basically, the western mass-media successfully made us believe that the syrian government was so downright stupid to carry out a chemical weapons attack exactly in those few days when the UN chemical weapons experts, which they themselves invited, were in the country. One must believe the syrian government to be insanely stupid to believe this.

Needless to say, back then many critical thinkers and intellectuals pointed out that this just doesn't make sense, that it's way more probable that the terrorists were responsible for the chemical weapons attack. For example, the world-famous investigative journalist Sermour Hersh (well-known for example for making the My Lai and Abu Ghraib scandals public) wrote a great article about it - but every single mass-media he contacted refused to print it. And later, many other institutions also came to the conclusion that it is extremely probable that it wasn't the syrian-government, but the terrorists, who were responsible for the attack. But apparently, those are minor details that the mass-media believes you should not or do not need to know...

Interesting read, I wasn't aware of any of this. Thanks for sharing. This whole issue is a mess and it honestly would not shock me that terrorist/rebels/other forces were using them and blaming the goverment in order to cause another country to intervene. All speculation of course, but it just underlies the importance that we cannot jump the gun and need to think through all these decisions critically, as well as the media holding so much control on the american public, myself included sometimes.

Boost6 said:
Areym said:

If you don't agree with getting involved, then shouldn't you be condeming this? Specially since it seems like he straight up bypassed congress, which he warned obama not to do back in 2013 when Assad also used chemical weapons.

Also, Isn't taking no action also an action?

Rebels not assad,  per the UN.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/

I stand corrected if true then. This just  validates that this sudden knee-jerk reaction by Trump may have been misplaced. The reaction around worldwide will interesting to see in the follow days/weeks.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

craighopkins said:
if assad had chemicals do u think trump would of fired cruise missles exposing the whole country to chemicals

It's just a show from the Potemkin Village a.ka. White House.



This email becomes more relevant every year, lol.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18328



It just doesn't make sense for Assad to attack with chemical weapons against civilians when the Syrian Gov is winning against oppositions forces and ISIS, being in the process of peace negotiations and having the US standing back letting him get on with it, what possible benefit would Assad have to get the whole international community off side, what? It just does not add up