It's fine even if "some" have ideology conflicts, it is irrelevant. What's relevant are the results of the study and if they are legitimate enough to be taken seriously. Besides i don't know what your fixation with this is. You brain can be trained to get better IQ results so i don't even think its related to race at all. All you can extrapolate is circunstancial results.

You seem to treat science as an entity with a will. Science is just a sum of conclusions. It doesn't have a will and is brought forth by people. Good people, have ethics. It's not that one wouldn't be able to throw out ethics, but as i say, we are humans, we empathise. It's all great to take that stance when it's not you beeing experimented on. So, i totally reject that notion. Human experimentation is something that should always be avoided, because every life is singular and precious.

I think it's pretty clear evolution is true to some extent. Where as religion is all speculation. That's why it's religion. ;)

evolution was thought of by a satanic person and is a hoax

it violates spontaneous generation, law of information systems, specified complexity, irreducible complexity, statistical mathematics, natural selection, fossil records, beneficial mutations, genetic complexity, and information theory

I'm pretty sure you don't know what half of those mean by simple fact of making that statement that is completely factually incorrect. 

Throughout 150 years of the science of bacteriology, there is no evidence that one species of bacteria has changed into another... Since there is no evidence for species changes between the simplest forms of unicellular life, it is not surprising that there is no evidence for evolution from prokaryotic [i.e., bacterial] to eukaryotic [i.e., plant and animal] cells, let alone throughout the whole array of higher multicellular organisms.

also the soft tissue found of dinosaurs is incredibly difficult to explain within an evolutionary (millions of years)  fits beautifully within a biblical (young earth) timescale; these are almost certainly the remains of creatures that were buried during the Genesis Flood, approximately 4,400 years ago

What progressive scientists? It seems like it's mostly leftist politicians, activists, media entities and progressives in general.

Pretty sure even progressive scientists have to accept the facts in front of them to some extent.

It's like those on the Christian right refuse to accept the theory of evolution prior to 50000 years ago and those on the left refuse to accept evolution from that point onwards.

I accept the whole lot. Not sure what that makes me. Sane I guess. 

But some of them could swim.

What happened to these?

Or do you believe they still exist?

Fact is the wrong term, you would be crucified in the scientific world by using that term.
You can go as far to say it is heavily supported, and the majority of people support the evolutionary theories.

WTF? Did you really say that evolution violates fossil records and natural selection?

Wut

Pretty sure you are trolling us now. Haha

And there is evidence that a world-wide flood never happened. There is evidence that the Genesis account conflicts with scientific evidence.
There is evidence the Bible even gets something as simple as P.I incorrect.

I think using a book that is written by man, doesn't have empirical evidence, substantiated accounts etc' is the incorrect way in trying to refute something that does actually have empirical evidence.

Evolution doesn't require faith to be real.

I think in general, people need to stop looking at it from a conservative vs progressive, left vs right point of view and just trust in the evidence provided.