Man... that was some SHADE!
Will you bring your AAA title to the Switch?
No.
But mobile games would run great on it.
Retro Tech Select - My Youtube channel. Covers throwback consumer electronics with a focus on "vid'ya games."
Latest Video: Top 12: Best Games on the N64 - Special Features, Episode 7
"There are no Plans, it wouldn’t run…"
"It might run… But we haven’t conducted the proper tests on whether it would run properly on Switch or not, so I cannot say for sure."
Wut.
Ljink96 said:
Nintendo fans would buy this though... FF started on Nintendo after all. They'd buy it over CoD and Mass Effect, I'm sure. It just fits Nintendo's demographic more. |
I bet most of it not all of the old nintendo ff fans bought a PlayStation 1/2/3/4 to play ff.
Soo noo.
Thanks for sharing your opinion, but ppl have different taste. Crazy right?
well, this sucks cause FFXV is one of the very few reasons I'm thinking of getting a Ps4 :/
don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^
Welp, can't say I'm surprised.
To make up for no FFXV, just make Bravely Third for Switch, pls Square-Enix :P
Well, they'd have to write Luminous Engine's shit code to work with ARM which would take another 10 fucking years. Probably would have had a shot if they used UE4, but there was no UE4 at the time, really, not very surprised.
Zekkyou said:
They aren't what drive the overall success of the IP. Zelda has more breathing room on this front than Final Fantasy (its core fanbase existing on the same general brand as the DS/3DS helps considerably), but even Zelda's handheld success is fuelled in large part by the reputation the core home console entries have given the series. I do agree SE should be more proactive with the Final Fantasy IP on handhelds (though we no doubt disagree in what capacity), but that wasn't my point of dispute. It was using something like Pokemon to dismiss the viability of the development style of Final Fantasy (and by logical extension the core entries of Zelda, GTA, etc) that i take issue with. To end off, it's worth noting that while SE could handle the Final Fantasy IP much better (and as far as I've seen they have improved considerably since the early 7th gen), it's not like they've been doing nothing but throwing money at FF15 for a decade. Whether ignoring the 3DS has been a mistake or not, the IP still has a strong WW presence. Especially in the last few years, it's been a debate more of success versus hypothetical extra success than sfailure versus success. There are worse places to be :p |
But the handheld Zelda games are made by the same Zelda team that makes the home console games (with the exception of the remakes and the spin-off Triforce Heroes). They also made Wind Waker HD.
So since 2011 the Zelda team made Wind Waker HD, A Link Between Worlds and now Breath of the Wild. Not nearly as bad as you made it sound.
As for GTA, that franchise keeps selling, even years after the release of a mainline title, so long development cycles are justified.
"The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" - Thoukydides
Was anyone expecting FFXV? I think KHIII is more likely to get a NS version.
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
