I use it outside of my home network, from my workplace during my lunch time, and it works fine for me.

Kudos to your workplace's network.  But, clearly from the disclaimer provided, that's not everyone's experience.  That doesn't change the double price point though.  And, it also doesn't change the problem of the PS4 controllers and Vita having completely different button mapping.  The Switch will have the same control scheme options whether docked or undocked.  As opposed to:

 Infamous: Second Son – Sadly, due to poor button mapping, the experience was marred.

 Watch_Dogs – The problem with Watch_Dogs’ controls on the Vita is not poor placement, instead it’s over use of multiple buttons.

 Call of Duty: Ghosts –   Whether it was in the campaign or in multiplayer, or even when I was sitting next to the console itself, the controls and gameplay felt sluggish, almost unlike any other game I’ve used remote play for.

Need For Speed: Rivals –  I found the sticks, being smaller, needed a little more fine tuning when switching to the peripheral.  Turns could be a little too erratic and out of my control.  

 Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes – Sadly, the menu and map (two very important controls used the Dual Shock 4’s touch pad in very different ways) did not transfer well to the Vita’s touch screen.  To pause the game was often a struggle, if it could even be pulled off in the first place.  The directions will tell you to tap the center of the front touch screen to use the menu, but I found it wasn’t so easy when I would have to tap different locations on the screen each time, or use two fingers to get the menu to open, or some other trick.

 Battlefield 4 – each time I tried remote play the game would be too far behind due to the signal delay, making it an unenjoyable exercise in losing.  It’s not that the controls were bad; in fact, they did just fine.  Unlike Killzone though, the game just could not perform with speed and consistency that is required for an FPS. 

https://middleofnowheregaming.com/2014/08/02/the-best-and-worst-of-the-playstation-vita-remote-play/

From your own articles : 

"Nintendo took pains this time to make the Wii U easier to develop for, guys. That report is based on really really old info." Is this even a positive post I mean it sounds like he's saying their lying that's really quite unclear.

Team Ninja - The makers behind Metroid Other M. Great source bud.

"Indie developer Shin’en Multimedia has made about two dozen small titles for various Nintendo platforms over the years, and they’re fully supporting the Wii U as well. In an interview with SuperPhillip, Shin’en’s Manfred Linzner said that the Wii U was not only very easy to develop for, but it doesn’t have many of the limitations that current generation consoles have." 

To clarify - in this article, he says that the ONLY IMPROVEMENTS he's scene is his own personal improvement at developing for the system, not support from Nintendo. He basically just says that they're getting better at dveloping with it every day, and that they think they've only tapped into 20% of the power. Nothing to do with Nintendo support or ease of use.

"So 60fps at 1080p and easier than ever before, that’s a lot of good news in one twitter stream"

Also, you literally used the same developers in 2 different articles - one wasn't even an article but a forumn. What was the point of that?

So  let's round this up : Team Ninja - uncredible. One from an indie developer who's made a lot of profit on Wii, and admits that the Wii U isn't easy to develop for. HIS UPDATED THOUGHTS only say that they're learning more about the Wii U everyday, and are impressed that they think they've only unlocked 20% of it's power. One literally is an indie developer just saying we have 60fps 1080. One post doesn't even seem positive(it sounds more like he's being negative towards it...I mean it was posted in jan of 2014 so it's possible). The only great source you provided was from the Darksiders developers.

None of this disproves that the developers are acting differently to switch.

Because like everything else...gamers want new and different experiences... VR being one of them...and you need mega power for good VR.

Good example is go back to when n64 and ps1 were released...technically they were in the same generation, but sony just blow everyone out of the water.

The report he's referring to was news at the time of the console being weak. "Nintendo took great pains to make Wii U easy to develop for" isn't unclear at all.

And Team Ninja making Other M has no detrimental bearing on their testimony regarding technical development; in fact, it bolsters it, as Other M, for all its gameplay and story faults, is one of the most technically advanced games on Wii.

Shin'en's CEO flat out called it "very easy to develop for". That's pretty unambiguous.

So right there you have Shin'en, Team Ninja, Activision, and Vigil all on record saying Wii U is easy to develop for.

How much developer testimony can you provide that Wii U was not easy to develop for?

Kudos to your workplace's network.  But, clearly from the disclaimer provided, that's not everyone's experience.  That doesn't change the double price point though.  And, it also doesn't change the problem of the PS4 controllers and Vita having completely different button mapping.  The Switch will have the same control scheme options whether docked or undocked.  As opposed to:

 Infamous: Second Son – Sadly, due to poor button mapping, the experience was marred.

 Watch_Dogs – The problem with Watch_Dogs’ controls on the Vita is not poor placement, instead it’s over use of multiple buttons.

 Call of Duty: Ghosts –   Whether it was in the campaign or in multiplayer, or even when I was sitting next to the console itself, the controls and gameplay felt sluggish, almost unlike any other game I’ve used remote play for.

Need For Speed: Rivals –  I found the sticks, being smaller, needed a little more fine tuning when switching to the peripheral.  Turns could be a little too erratic and out of my control.  

 Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes – Sadly, the menu and map (two very important controls used the Dual Shock 4’s touch pad in very different ways) did not transfer well to the Vita’s touch screen.  To pause the game was often a struggle, if it could even be pulled off in the first place.  The directions will tell you to tap the center of the front touch screen to use the menu, but I found it wasn’t so easy when I would have to tap different locations on the screen each time, or use two fingers to get the menu to open, or some other trick.

 Battlefield 4 – each time I tried remote play the game would be too far behind due to the signal delay, making it an unenjoyable exercise in losing.  It’s not that the controls were bad; in fact, they did just fine.  Unlike Killzone though, the game just could not perform with speed and consistency that is required for an FPS. 

https://middleofnowheregaming.com/2014/08/02/the-best-and-worst-of-the-playstation-vita-remote-play/

along with that very few developers pledged to support the Wii U comparatively with how many have pledged to support the Switch

in fact big third party devs like Bethesda pretty much shit on the Wii U from conception. you can be as much of a naysayer as you want, but the Switch so far has stronger vocal third party support by like multiples (2x? 3x?) then has been seen for any Nintendo system in generations 

About 3 times the power of the Vita.

150+ Gflops (neogaf) when not docked, abit under what the Wii U is.

Its decent as a handheld.

As a home console I was hopeing for abit more "oompf" to it.