EricHiggin on 09 December 2016
I don't see PS going PS3 ever again. They went back to their PS2 sweet spot, not to high, not to low, right in the middle, and its working wonders for them. If anything, PS will continue to make their money through software and service going forward, and will sell PS5 at cost. It will be designed to be a worth while upgrade, while not making it to expensive that they leave that middle space, but also enough to compete with MS.
This gen reminds me a lot of the PS2/Xbox gen, which also makes me think MS is going to do the same thing they did then. Launch next gen "early" (360/Scorpio) and try to shift the momentum their way. This worked last time, but wont be as easy this time since PS5 will not be $599, will not be anything other than x86, and will most likely be BC.
I would think Scorpio goes for a $499 price as well, to try and push PS to launch PS5 not only sooner than they would like to, but more expensive than they want, to compete hardware wise, pushing them into the mid-high end level that doesn't sell near as quickly. Whether this leads to PS subsidizing PS5 somewhat to move more consoles quicker, or if PS sticks to their "no subsidizing" rule and PS5 sells much more slowly at first, it will benefit MS and Scorpio and will give them an edge next gen that they don't have now.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.