Soundwave said:
Miyamotoo said:
Actually make sense if they want to have very strong launch and make very attractive console right of gate.
If they launch both games on Switch launch that doesn't mean later will be drought.
|
It doesn't make sense even from that POV. There's only a set amount of units available for launch anyway and those are likely to sell out no matter what just with Zelda.
Most systems sell their initial stock no problem.
Nintendo's problem has been their post launch periods have been atrocious.
So moving Mario into that slot would make way more sense.
I'd say there's almost 0 chance Nintendo would launch them on the same day, even if they are both 100% complete. Just bad usage of resources.
|
That's not true, Nintendo said they will increase numbers of Switch launch units if there is bigger interest.
You assuming they will have problem with post launch period if they launch bought these games, but you dont know that, actually Nintendo said they will have strong launch and strong post launch period.
Like I wrote, actually totaly make sense beacuse they launching new console in middle of generation with very strong competition, and in March, so its not hard to imagine they will want to have very strong launch and make very attractive console right of gate.
Wii Sports and Zelda TP were killing launch combination for Wii, it's not hard to imagine they want something similar with Switch with new 3D Mario and new Zelda.
Soundwave said: Super Mario Galaxy 2 could have been ready for holiday 2009 as well ... Nintendo held off on it until June 2010 because they already had NSMB Wii for holiday 2009. So these things happen. It's not a big deal. I actually said this many times a while ago. Zelda for launch and Mario in the post-launch period makes a lot of sense. |
That's totally different because that wasn't launch period, also having 2 Mario games instead of Mario and Zelda is also totally different.