You mean the organized list of topics that you can apply filters to and sort by author/recent/number of views? That's shit to you? 

It's a list. It gets the job done and more. But OK. 

Ye, they're too spacde apart, I have to actually scroll down and it's more difficult to just glance through. Much more convenient just having the list on the front page. Look at the left there's the articles, look in the middle there's the usually horrendously out of date sales, look at the right there's the recently active threads. Perfect!

You actually think people come here to discuss games? Where?

Most of the threads are about Meta scores, sales, predictions, charts, NPD, Japan weeklies, etc.

Then there is the "PRO will otusell your mom", "X vs Y" and "PHILL SPENCER HURTS MY FEELINGS WITH HIS RECENT STATEMENTS" types of threads. 

Not many threads discuss the core of the games, elements of gameplay, stories and whatnot. The community just aren't interested in these topics, there were multiple attempts to push these kinds of threads but they never took off.

The usual pattern here on vgc is that once the game gets released and the hype is gone, we only talk about it if it achieves a milestone or ... LOL FLOPS. 

I've been visiting vgc for so many years and this is how it's always been. 

All of those things are related to games and the gaming industry...

Noted. I am out.

I was thinking the same thing, lol. It's a video game sales forum, obviously sales performance and industry news that could impact sales is going to be a lead issue. 

I'll leave this here in case people didn't know already but Trucks does some work on the site and he has a thread where you can request new features, such as a filter for the front page for example. It's right here: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=197831&page=1 . So I would check that out.

I encourage you to read this deep analysis of the movie's claims and evidence:  http://www.counterbalance.org/expelled/index-frame.html

FYI, the writer is Christian and used to be a high level Intelligent Design advocate, but has since abandoned it.  The part that seems most relevant to what you were talking about is his examination of the claims of academic censure and blackballing of people who questioned evolution or proposed intelligent design.  He assessed one case as being totally without merit; in another case any repercussions were minor at worst and more like not being invited to office parties; and in the third case he reckoned that the guy's application for tenure might indeed have been affected, but there were also other factors. 

Oh yes, of course I know about the  rebuttals and refutations EXPELLED got. That was a powerful documentary, if it went unchallenged it could change the mind of many people, specialy youngsters seduced by their evolutionist teachers.

Every single good thing will be refuted by the evil it denounces. And every single evil thing will be opposed by a little source of good. 

Does not matter, as long as the message reaches a few ears still capable of hearing.

I didn't ask if you were aware that scientists had rebutted Expelled's claims.  I asked you to read this specific analysis which was written from a sympathetic perspective.  Have you read it? 

Or do you not even care if the movie is accurate as long as it gets someone to agree with you?