JEMC said: There are some new "leaks" and benches going on in the web, but there are some things to consider:
You're going to want to watch @PCGamer's @E3 #PCGamingShow at 1:30 p.m. CT on 6/13. Trust us https://t.co/xIpjXswjoNhttps://t.co/TVzkSHvIoO
These are the screenshots and videos that I've found:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_qg2PITCts
|
Lots of information but where's the comparison to existing cards? By how much will an RX 480 beat a GTX 980?
About the RX 480, I think it was a huge disappointment that AMD is only releasing a mid-range card and leaving the whole high-end market to Nvidia, but more importantly, not offering a choice for us who want the high-end even if it means $700 for a GPU.
It feels stupid because it also solidifies the common view that AMD is the poor man's budget choice.
It's also worrying for Vega. If they really had the tech, by all logic they should have made a big chip 490 Polaris right now, so it must mean they just don't have the performance. I don't understand with all the talk about "big" Polaris and "small" Polaris in the past year, how can the best they offer from a brand new generation be a $229 card?
I'm beginning to think that Vega will be a disappointment. It won't come out until December and only beats the 1080 by 5-10%, and right after, Nvidia counters with a GTX1080 Titanium that is over 20% faster than a GTX1080.
Damn it, because I want to replace my R9 290 as fast as possible, and as a fan, AMD is my only choice. It's already been 2.5 years and I still can't make an upgrade.
What GPU was it u had JEMC? A GTX970?