By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PC master race! Are you impressed by Uncharted 4's graphics?

 

As a PC gamer. Uncharted 4 as one whole package...

has exceeded all games before it. 513 49.00%
 
I've seen better. 239 22.83%
 
Roughly the same as games I've played on PC. 93 8.88%
 
Indifference. I do not own a high end PC. 202 19.29%
 
Total:1,047
Chazore said:
eva01beserk said:

We have more proof than with the witcher, the previous dev claimed they aimed for parity, wich led to belive MS was behind that, while the wicher devs claimed teh oposite, that why they would do everithing they can to optimize for pc since its where the core base is.

Now I cant remember if this started cuz of the witcher 3, or im confusing 2 diferent conversations... o well.

Parity was still a result if you had to scale back in the end regardless of the excuse. I don't think with CDPR's excuse means they think their core base is where they think it is, I mean there is being honest to your base and then there is lip service, tell them what they want to hear. 

True, thats why there wasent an uproar with that game. There could have been a shady deal there, but they dint let anything slip. Thats why to much PR is sometimes a bad thing. Like you said before, console gamers would not have noticed much at the end, but then the devs opened their mouths and backlash started.



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.

Around the Network
Hynad said:
Chazore said:

I would hope that they had learned something, I mean it's one thing for forcing parity but it's another to just throw in a few options that demand a lot more power but provide little visual gains. Honestly though I think it's only fair to lend more to visuals for those that pay for more high end hardware than deciding to screw them over at every turn.

How is people paying for high end hardware the problem of the game makers? What do game makers make from people buying such hardware?

That's entitlement, and no, it isn't fair to ask developers to spend more money on a version of their game (as if it wasn't expensive enough to develop all those versions at once) just because you bought high end hardware. On most occasions, the game will run better than on consoles even if they don't create a special version just for you.

Well. If the game makers don't wish to support high-end PC's they are entitled to do so.

But that comes with some caveats...

There are a plethora of PC gamers who won't bother purchasing said game because of the fact.

They will also not be able to use a high-end PC to advertise their game with their impressive visuals, which pretty much every multi-platform does, most evident when it was Frostbite powered games on last gen, EA advertised their games by using PC graphics.


John2290 said:

There is no mendium for sound to travel in space. While amazing alright, you can't call that amazing physics,

You really have no idea what they accomplished with the Physics in that video do you? Let's just say it's more than just a box crumbling after being shot at or cloth moving in a non-existent breeze.

And whilst you are correct about sound in space, this is also a game... And just like movies it is used to add immersion.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

Pemalite said:
goopy20 said:

True, it happens all the time, but at least those are not crowdfund games. I mean they have raised nearly $100m for Star Citizen and there is a big chance that the game never even gets a release. They keep adding new ships that people can spend a fortune on and add insane features (a whole alien language.. I mean, come on..) yet they are forgetting to build a game to put them in. 

Anyways, if we are talking about why UC4 is the most impressive game when it comes to the overal visual package, Star Citizen is really not the game people should mention to prove otherwise as the game is one big incoherent mess. Someone asked what we should compare Star Citizen with, is it a MMO, space sim, FPS? Fact is, we don't fucking know because its trying to do everything and that's the problem.  

You should probably play games like Freelancer to understand what Star Citizen is trying to achieve.

I understand what they're trying to do. And yes, if they can pull it off, it will be mankind's greatest achievement and I will never leave the house again. The only issue I have with SC is that they market it as something that is just too good to be true and that it starts to feel more and more like a money grabbing scheme. I mean hardcore PC gamers are really craving for a game that finally makes the consoles feel like the toys that they are (hence why they always flip out when something like UC4 comes out). And with SC it seems like Chris Roberts is playing the frustrated pc gamers like a damn fiddle, telling them exactly what they want to hear and showing insane features that'll only work in the realm of pc gaming awesomess. 

But just think about it: Normally when games get canned it sucks and that's it. But if this Godzilla project gets canned, the $100m that people invested in it will just go up in air. All the money people spend on ships and modules will basically be flushed down the toilet and they will be left with nothing. Hell, it's no wonder that the fanbase is so passionate on the forum when they poured hundreds of dollars in it and have been waiting years for a game to show for it. Personally, I think that it's very likely that SC will never be completed because they just can't stop adding new features to further delay the game... almost as if they're doing it on purpose. I'm also pretty sure that if the game gets canned, Chris Roberts will be laughing his way to the bank regardless. 



uncharted 4 has better graphics than any pc game.

it's laughable that someone can say Game 1 has better physics Game 2 has better lighting Game 3 has better grass etc as if that makes uncharted inferior..

as a single game there's nothing on steam origin or uplay that looks as good as this. tbh i dont think theres any game good as this on pc



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

Skeeuk said:
uncharted 4 has better graphics than any pc game.

it's laughable that someone can say Game 1 has better physics Game 2 has better lighting Game 3 has better grass etc as if that makes uncharted inferior..

as a single game there's nothing on steam origin or uplay that looks as good as this. tbh i dont think theres any game good as this on pc

In your opinon like the rest of us on here.

Nott hat it matters trying to discuss about anything else on PC since it will never matter to people on this forum even if something good came up on PC, it would easily be tossed aside for something else, guaranteed every time. 



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Around the Network
ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Chazore said:

In your opinon like the rest of us on here.

Nott hat it matters trying to discuss about anything else on PC since it will never matter to people on this forum even if something good came up on PC, it would easily be tossed aside for something else, guaranteed every time

This is not even true and you always doing this and saying EVERYONE HATES PC things EVERYONE trashs pc people and EVERYONE  is against PC, you are on vgchartz since 2014, 2 fucking years and i see you say this like ALL THE TIME.

If you think this way  , if you think the VGCHARTZ community is against everything pc all time and you seem to be all about pc and this brings you so much pain why dont you just go away ? Damn, your narrative is is getting so annoying man, all time complaining about this site but you still here. Its almost everyday ffs.

Careful. I was recently banned for saying he complains a lot...



Chazore said:

God damn that woodland looks pretty good for 10 years old with those mods.

Also I was amazed by the explosion physics in SC as well as destruction to the ships:

Teehee. A pet peeve of mine in all space based movies/games is when explosions don't follow the laws of physics (though for some reason I always accept that there is sound, even though there is nothing for the soundwaves to propagate through in space). Don't get me wrong, the graphics look great and all, but it looks like the fragments of the ship that are blown off in the main explosion slow down a while after the explosion, which obviously wouldn't happen, because in space there is no air resistance so there would be no force interacting with the fragments, so them slowing down sort of doesn't follow Newton's first law :-3

(The force of gravity would interact with the fragments, but in such a miniscule way that it in no way could explain how much those fragments accelerate. Gravity's impact on those fragments wouldn't be noticable on this timescale.)

What I'm talking about is particularly noticeable from 0:15-0:20. But I guess it could be that it just looks like they slow down due to the angle and that they are dispersing and becoming harder to see.

EDIT: The first time I thought about this pet peeve was when watcing A New Hope (the special edition). If you see the Death Star explosion, there's a ring/disc that appears on the vertical axis, but there shouldn't be a ring like that since the pressure outside is equal everywhere (ie. zero), so the explosion should just be expanding in a normal spherical shape, with no disc/ring shape on the vertical axis.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCrxKbJ1ayc



Hynad said:

Careful. I was recently banned for saying he complains a lot...

Come on Hynad lets make this a thing because it's clear you really want to make this personal like you did in the article, if you want the gloves to come off then you need only say, tell me how you honestrly feel about me.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

ClassicGamingWizzz said:

This is not even true and you always doing this and saying EVERYONE HATES PC things EVERYONE trashs pc people and EVERYONE  is against PC, you are on vgchartz since 2014, 2 fucking years and i see you say this like ALL THE TIME.

If you think this way  , if you think the VGCHARTZ community is against everything pc all time and you seem to be all about pc and this brings you so much pain why dont you just go away ? Damn, your narrative is is getting so annoying man, all time complaining about this site but you still here. Its almost everyday ffs.

I see plenty of "haters" from other people's perspectives on here and yet I don't see you ragging them down. Your own is just as annoying.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Chazore said:
Hynad said:

Careful. I was recently banned for saying he complains a lot...

Come on Hynad lets make this a thing because it's clear you really want to make this personal like you did in the article, if you want the gloves to come off then you need only say, tell me how you honestrly feel about me.

I don't feel anything particular about you. I don't really know the person facing that screen of yours. I simply think you complain and whine way too much and come off as a broken record anytime something PC gaming related is mentioned, discussed or implied

As far as I can remember, you haven't always been like that, but I may be wrong.