Naw man, the constructive criticism of games is the lifeblood of VGchartz really, someone brings up a reason why they don't like something and others chat about how they agree or disagree, I think you've found yourself on the receiving end of the vocal minority who would rather name call in caps because you have dissed an aspect of a game which launched.

But I think Blizzard has just done themselves a bit of an injustice when it comes to the PC release of the game, since if you click on buying it on battlenet you are taken to buy the Origin pack which has things like a few skins for a selection of the Heroes and then bonus content.... for all of blizzards other games, Mercys wings for Diablo, a winston pet in WoW, a card or deck for hearthstone, some portraits for starcraft and so forth, but the thing is... if you click to buy above that you can select just Overwatch on it's own without the digital cosmetic stuff (mostly for other games) and you find the game there for €39.99 I think in trying to push the Origin pack they've actually made people think this game is more expensive than it actually can be gotten for.

That said consoles don't have an option other than Origin pack... and also don't get the items for the other blizz games on the PC ... so fuck console owners it seems a little bit :D

But yeah... Never stop criticising shit you don't like in games... when that happens then devs will have zero feedback on what is good or bad about their games, not a good thing!

THANK YOU CAPTAIN OBVIOUS! Do you think I'm fucking stupid or did you not read what I said to you? I fucking know it's free now. It WASN'T free when it came out almost 9 YEARS AGO! That's all that matters in this argument.

They will add more maps, but it's not like they need more. Look at the two most popular games right now. League of Legends and CS: GO. CS: GO has maybe 10 maps (but only 7 are played at a time) and I don't play League, but I'm pretty sure there are hardly any maps in that game either.

The game is not boring, as evidenced by the millions of people playing it right now. Just because you can't find any fun in it (maybe you're just not committed to doing anything but running up the middle of the map and dying) doesn't mean others haven't.

There are ZERO problems with these microtransactions.

You can voice your opinion. Doesn't mean it isn't stupid. Just know that a fuckton of people disagree with you. Just because the users on this site back you doesn't mean shit.

The last question is, what multiplayer games do you like? What is fully fleshed out? Not repetitive? What is good in your eyes? I highly doubt you'll come up with something, because I'm pretty sure you just don't enjoy these types of games. Which is fine. Go ahead. But there's no reason to shit on the game because you don't like a particular genre.

User was moderated for this post ~ CGI

yes there is bias for Blizzard espacially for these reviewers. No way in hell deserves overwatch a 90+ on metacritic. The user score is the more honest score the game should have gotten.

Street Fighter is an established franchise with expectations for what it needs to have. In no way similar to Overwatch at all. SFV launched very bare bones and was penalized for it. To be honest I am glad Overwatch is scoring well. Maybe reviewers have finally removed the sticks from their asses in regards to reviewing MP only games.

That said, LOL @ Blizzard bias and user scores being the more "honest" scores. And how much Overwatch have you played?

One thing people forget when complaining about content value for $60 and how bad microtransactions are is that all future DLC for the game is completely free. All new maps, modes, and characters will be free of charge. And you don't need to grind for it or buy it with real money. It's completely free.

Can't really say for others, I rather enjoyed the beta and have considered buying it a few times over the weekend, seeing the insults flying here about how great it is really makes me think about how much the game relies on having a good community to be worth the money for me. I think other than wow there is no other game I play online, like I said though, liked the beta a lot just not the regular game type I play so the price is a little bit of a block for me. I'll see how sales are though for it, if tons of people pick it up then I'm sure there will be loads playing it for the next year at least. 

Just see things like evolve dying pretty quickly because the players weren't playing it, wouldn't fancy my first online shooter to not have people to shoot :) oh.....  Slight untruth!  I played some of mag just to see the mayhem of 256 players in a game but didn't actually rank up beyond the 128 player rounds, was still crazy tho.

Street Fighter is an established franchise with expectations for what it needs to have. In no way similar to Overwatch at all. SFV launched very bare bones and was penalized for it. To be honest I am glad Overwatch is scoring well. Maybe reviewers have finally removed the sticks from their asses in regards to reviewing MP only games.

That said, LOL @ Blizzard bias and user scores being the more "honest" scores. And how much Overwatch have you played?

One thing people forget when complaining about content value for $60 and how bad microtransactions are is that all future DLC for the game is completely free. All new maps, modes, and characters will be free of charge. And you don't need to grind for it or buy it with real money. It's completely free.

It doesn't seem like you followed the media the past months. Overwatch will be a mega hit and will have no trouble breaking the 10m player mark. Just because it's incredibly well done and polished. The fact that Battleborn is tanking because it's just slightly the same as Overwatch but gets compared to it constantly is another testament to this.

That said, I will never ever play it because sadly it's not my genre. But Even I love what I'm seeing.