Overwatch is much, much too expensive.

[Azuren]

LudicrousSpeed said:

Ruler said:

yes there is bias for Blizzard espacially for these reviewers. No way in hell deserves overwatch a 90+ on metacritic. The user score is the more honest score the game should have gotten.

Street Fighter is an established franchise with expectations for what it needs to have. In no way similar to Overwatch at all. SFV launched very bare bones and was penalized for it. To be honest I am glad Overwatch is scoring well. Maybe reviewers have finally removed the sticks from their asses in regards to reviewing MP only games.

That said, LOL @ Blizzard bias and user scores being the more "honest" scores. And how much Overwatch have you played?

One thing people forget when complaining about content value for $60 and how bad microtransactions are is that all future DLC for the game is completely free. All new maps, modes, and characters will be free of charge. And you don't need to grind for it or buy it with real money. It's completely free.

Street Fighter V is a game from a genre that almost exclusively defines itself by multiplayer competition that released with no single player campaign. 

Sounds an awful lot like Overwatch.

Oh wait, no, except SFV also promised DLC that you could earn, a campaign shortly after release, characters people were acquainted with, some classic and some revamped to differenciate themselves. In addition to this, there are new characters with widely varied skills and abilities to begin with, making every character vastly unique.

So what you're saying is, even though they are both multiplayer genre without stories and a varied roster that represent the pinnacle of their genres... one is somehow more deserving because the other is already established?

 

No sir, I don't believe I'll be drinking that Kool-aid.