Ruler on 29 May 2016
| Azuren said: Is it trolling to say I feel it might be a tad overrated? Because I feel it's a tad overrated. The last time a game released with only multiplayer and no campaign, it was panned for doing so (even though it was promised within two months for free). I feel there might be a bit of Blizzard bias going on. Don't get me wrong, the game looks fantastic, but it doesn't seem like it brings anything revolutionary to the table. It's just a fresher, Blizzard-ier Team Fortress with Pixar-y animation (which you don't really get to ever see any of your own animations due to the whole First Person thing). SFV was a solid fighter with great animation and pseudo-free DLC (you could earn it or buy it), but sorry- no story, so it's clearly a mediocore game. I guess I just don't understand. Eh. On topic, yeah, $60 is too expensive. But so is $40 for an FPS Moba. I'd pay $15, tops. |
yes there is bias for Blizzard espacially for these reviewers. No way in hell deserves overwatch a 90+ on metacritic. The user score is the more honest score the game should have gotten.
