Hynad said:
Nautilus said:
really?For me it was heavily implied.Then again, I dont remember much of that game and can be my imagination.... Ill be playing the HD versino ina few months, so Ill remember.
Now to the other questions, not wanting to be mean, but I already wrote extensively about it in the other posts, so if you want to know the reason, just read through them.And yes, tradition is important, as a caracther legacy is also important.Imagine if for Uncharted 4 they made Drake into a woman(and gave a really good reason plot-wise for that to happen), how would fans feel?It just feels out of place, even though Nintendo could really do it.
|
Every Zelda game, or almost all of them, have a different Link. This is completely different from Uncharted, where it is the story of a fully fleshed-out and defined character. Your comparison doesn't stand. And you haven't given any reasonable reason so far in this thread.
|
Link has different incarnations, but he has the same soul.The same goes for Zelda.And no, thats not the same thing.
Reasonable is the keyword here.thats your opinion, and I respect that.But Im 200% sure that I gave a reason that is more than reasonableLike I said, plot-wise it is more than possible that Link may be reborn as a girl, even though there is the reason that Spemanig said that he may well not be reborn that way, but other than simply making a zelda skin, there is no good reason.Now, if you agree with that or not, thats really your problem.Especially since you also gave no reason why this should exist other than "why not?".
And what do you mean by Uncharted having a "fully fleshed-out and defined character"?.As far as I know, Link is also fully fleshed-out.He is a steriotype hero, but he is.