foodfather said: Such an unreasonable amount of money, will probably result in a loss of hundreds of jobs. |
Agreed. Gawker have obviously done the wrong thing and do deserve to pay but... 115 million? That's injustice.
foodfather said: Such an unreasonable amount of money, will probably result in a loss of hundreds of jobs. |
Agreed. Gawker have obviously done the wrong thing and do deserve to pay but... 115 million? That's injustice.
foodfather said: Such an unreasonable amount of money, will probably result in a loss of hundreds of jobs. And didn't know Kotaku was so disliked around here. What did they do? Say something positive about Xbox? |
ironmanDX said:
Agreed. Gawker have obviously done the wrong thing and do deserve to pay but... 115 million? That's injustice. |
"People could lose jobs" - Not compelling motivation for a court to ignore misconduct. Also, you think 115 million is steep? Yeah, that's just the jury award. Wait until the punitive damages come in, which can be up to 3x the amount of the jury award :)
.
Last edited by OttoniBastos - on 31 July 2018If someone has an AH.com account, please let me know what they think of this. I have to laugh a bit!
OttoniBastos said:
¹Not that unreasonable when you think about the amount of money Hogan lost when his contract with WWF ended because of gawker. ²Kotaku is constantly antagonazing with the demographic that basically form the community of this site(18-35 weaboo jrpg player) |
His net worth was 8 million before this so.... What... 500k a year on a legends contract and a couple of wresltemania apperences?
It's also been wwe for about 20 years now. Trust me, it's unreasonable.
Moved to general discussion.
OT: Probably a good attempt to find balance between free press and personal freedom.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
Chevinator123 said: They actually used alot of the fappening drama in the actual trail aswell lol |
This is what people need to remember in terms of the damage that they were happy to do, it was a sex tape recorded without the knowledge of the person in it, released without their consent, uploaded and taken out of their control, even when a court judge told them to remove it, they refused.
Even the fucking moderators at 4chan had the decency to remove the constant threads of the fappening pictures from there after the initial couple of days and shit storm had gone over, but clearly from what Gawker got in terms of views on these 2 Hulk articles 4.9m and 242k views pictured here, compared to their normal drival (combined less than 1m views from both articles trying to be white knights about nude pictures) whoever was in charge of both sides of those articles should really take a long look at themselves in the mirror (if they can afford one) and think if the genders were reversed would they have insisted on keeping up a sex tape of a woman and suggested blending your phone and hand for taking a nude pic of Hogan and sharing it online?
Also when it comes to Hulks image and what it is worth, keep in mind that it isn't just what he has in the bank, his estate would still be earning money for years to come even after Hulks death selling Hulkamania t-shirts and DVD boxsets of his matches if his career had come to a proper clean end with the WWE on top of obvious money for appearences at WWE events over the next few years.
Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive
Punitive Damages have been determined:
BREAKING: Hulk Hogan sex video jury awards $25M in punitive damages, above the $115 million already awarded.
— The Associated Press (@AP) March 21, 2016