| RavenXtra said: Releasing them backwards? Whatever you say Capcom :| |
Well, they're leaving the worst one for the end, so we get the goodies before. What's not to like?
| RavenXtra said: Releasing them backwards? Whatever you say Capcom :| |
Well, they're leaving the worst one for the end, so we get the goodies before. What's not to like?
Good news and they will no doubt sell well but capcom better fucking make a proper AAA RE7. They're making a lot of money from these remasters so the demand is obviously there and they've an onus to reward fans for rebuying so many games.
What's interesting that they are releasing them in the wrong order. Releasing RE6 first, then RE5 and last RE4. Strange.
RE4 is on everything but a toaster at this point
NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

Wright said:
Well, they're leaving the worst one for the end, so we get the goodies before. What's not to like? |
You shouldn't call the best and most influential Resident Evil game the worst one Wright :P
Did I mention it was the best? Well its the best one!
Well, guess this will help fund RE2 Remake and RE7, so im game.
Actually, im just making excuses. I would have gotten it either way. Even RE6, wich i really disliked as a whole. Even RE5 wich was coop fun but frustating when in single player. Even RE4 wich i played it in every platform its available ever. I guess i suffer from somekind of decease.
I prefer the classic ones, but for some reason i just have the need to play every RE that comes out (exept the really trash ones like ORC). Is it just me...?
I actually would not mind playing RE5 again and trying to platinum. It was a pretty fun co-op game, despite the loss of horror.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.



