So why arent japanese reviewers allowed in metacrtic? the game is allready out in japan they should have score right from the start from famitsu etc. Its biased from the start and then for some reason all these western reviewers trash these japanese games.

Not one reviewer ever mentions the price in these reviews, i never have seen it any review. 

Except for the fact that they dont cost 60$ but 40-50$ except for devils third. And a lot of these indies cost 20 bucks now, they get pretty overpriced and there is no option to buy them used.

I haven't played any of them but from what i hear they were all bad games and deserved low metascores. But then again nintendo fans have gotten used to their first party generic platformers getting 90s...

It's pretty strange the reviews of Fatal Frame who are not a fan of the content that series has always had, would be like someone criticizing Call of Duty for being a shooter or a Mario game for being yet another platformer, doesn't really make sense.

As for the comments regarding the Wii-U's pad having short battery life so you could turn off that other game... well maybe the reviewer was just trying to be a bit funny and add some comedy to what he felt was a review of just bad things about a game, gotta give someone a reason to read your content if you're just calling a bad game bad, comedy can help to get hits sometimes. I'm just saying, I wouldn't take that comment to be a direct attack at the Wii-U's battery or controller, I think just some fairly badly chosen comedy.

http://www.amazon.com/Rodea-Sky-Soldier-Wii-U/dp/B00TXCBT4M

That's already 2 out of 3 and Fatal Frame is still at least twice as expensive as indie games.