By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - So it looks like Pixels is beyond terrible.

DélioPT said:

I'm going take a chance on it.

People said The Island was a bad movie but i really enjoyed it. That and a Vandamme movie that was bad but i still enjoyed watching. :D

The Island was not a bad movie at all. You're talking about the one with Ewan McGregor, correct? That was actually quite a decent movie but unfortunately it was underrated and quite misunderstood. It wasn't a movie for everyone and not your mindless eat a bucket of popcorn film. I didn't find it overly complicated either, I'm not so sure that many people really liked or "felt" the twist in the film.




Around the Network
Augen said:
Spike0503 said:


What exactly is your point?. Due to his small stature that was the best way he had to fight his enemies during the prequels (Dooku and Palpatine). It was a fighting style of his own and a great showing of his caliber as an elder jedi master. I have to disagree with you, it wasn't degrading in any way shape or form. Having a flexible fighting style doesn't take anything from his character as a wise, intelligent master.

 


Part of it was how I saw Yoda in Empire and Jedi. We never saw him use a light sabre and wasn't really the point of Luke's training either. He spoke about a state of mind and clearing thoughts and emotions.  His power was how he saw the universe on a high plane than others.  His demonstration was to lift an X-Wing out of  a swamp with his mind. Despite being small and centuries old he did something that left Luke humbled.

To me Yoda is not a warrior in that sense, he is a teacher that is above "crude matter".  In real life he would be akin to the Dalai Lama, parting wisdom and teachings to make pupils better beings as much as better warriors.

The best way for Yoda to fight would be his mastery of the force.  Physically he is not imposing and could not over power anyone and in his advanced years he could not out maneuver anyone.  So, why is Yoda so highly respected?  It shows what is valued by Jedi is not ultimately power, but rather wisdom and understanding.  

If I were to construct a Yoda scene in the prequels I'd have a monster of an opponent, big and ferocious filled with rage spinning his/her light sabre at this pitiful little creature. Only to see all that pride stripped away as this master attempts to talk and then failing that, with a shake of his weary head waves his hand smashing the opponent into the wall or ground.  That would be powerful imagery that demonstrates Yoda and fits in line with the world and character. Don't even need a battle honestly. Could have Yoda convert troubled Sith from the dark side showing his patience and understanding and how tragic it is to him lose wayward Jedi.  

My point is the prequels missed what Yoda was and see only value in fighting with a light sabre.  A battle between the Emperor and Yoda should have shown how far they were above their knights.  The Emperor using matter as an attack with lightning or other elements and Yoda deflecting and moving objects.  Be some great dialogue about the nature of beings and the force with the Emperor trying to cloud Yoda's mind and Yoda showing he is above such tricks.  The Emperor even chides Luke in Jedi with his "Jedi weapon" and yet there he is in the senate spinning and all with his own.  The winner such a contest is simply the stronger one, the better fighter, and I find that to make Yoda less than what he was in the old films.

I understand what you are saying but they did have a force duel both in Yoda vs Dooku and Yoda vs Palpatine. In the duel between Yoda and Dooku they reached a stalemate so that's why they continued with the lightsabers. In my opinion, the use of lightsabers is a crucial part of being a Jedi and also of being a Sith. It doesn't mean that a Jedi or a Sith cannot be more profficent in using the force, but there needs to be some skill with the lightsaber. I don't think there is anything wrong with a Jedi master of Yoda's caliber showing his combat skills in the way he did in those duels. There is a certain finesse and a degree of wisdom in using such a weapon effectively. You can see this in the duel between Obi-wan and General Grievous, Grievous attacked him savagely with many different lightsabers at the same time yet Obi-wan's defense with a single lightsaber was enough to overpower him.

 

That said, I do agree that perhaps they could've shown the force being used in different, perhaps more creative ways rather than the same old telekinesis and Sith lightning considering both Yoda and Palpatine were the absolute powers of both the light and dark side of the force.



Ruler said:
i bet the movie is very decent, these reviewers are just biased and clickbait


I guess you haven't seen any Adam Sandler movies in the past ten years the guy has won and got nominated for more Razzies (Oscars for bad movies) over the past decade then any other actor or actress.



Airaku said:
DélioPT said:

I'm going take a chance on it.

People said The Island was a bad movie but i really enjoyed it. That and a Vandamme movie that was bad but i still enjoyed watching. :D

The Island was not a bad movie at all. You're talking about the one with Ewan McGregor, correct? That was actually quite a decent movie but unfortunately it was underrated and quite misunderstood. It wasn't a movie for everyone and not your mindless eat a bucket of popcorn film. I didn't find it overly complicated either, I'm not so sure that many people really liked or "felt" the twist in the film.

Yes, that's the one.
I remember hearing about the movie not being good.

I can't recall now, but i think i saw other movies that i know they weren't good, but i still enjoyed watching them.
For example, people criticized Grown Ups with Adam Sandler, but i really thought the movie was funny.



aikohualda said:
I don't know what people expect from Adam Sandler......


Most of his movies are bad (especially more recent ones).  However, I don't give a fuck what people say.  Happy Gilmore, Billy Maddison and Coneheads are good comedies.  I don't even remember his part in Coneheads though.  Happy Gilmore is probably his best movie and that isn't saying too much but the ratings seem too damn low to me.  What's next?  Tommy Boy is rated bellow a 50?

Pixels looks like pure shit.  The trailer looked terrible and I have no interest in seeing it.



Around the Network
DélioPT said:

Yes, that's the one.
I remember hearing about the movie not being good.

I can't recall now, but i think i saw other movies that i know they weren't good, but i still enjoyed watching them.
For example, people criticized Grown Ups with Adam Sandler, but i really thought the movie was funny.

The Island was pretty good, it was just misunderstood and A LOT of people were criticizing it because of it's twists. At least that's how I remember it, it wasn't by any means a bad movie. Actually it was one of Michael Bay's more "intelligent" movies. It's kind of funny how critics slammed him to be more smart and then slams him when he is..... Everyone just loves to hate on him XD

Grown Up's was kinda dumb but number 2 was funny. Big Daddy and Little Nicky will always be his best movies imo! The Wedding Singer is up there! Also I believe he directed the Deuce Bigalow films! Those movies are funny as hell!!! Defiantly worth a watch for the laughs, the first film was a commercial success where the 2nd one was considered too offensive XD

Comedies in general seem to get low ratings and no one ever seems to bitch about them. Pixels seems to be a very special case..... I mean everyone knew Paul Blart was for kids XD




Won two free tickets, so I'm going to see it next Tuesday.



Airaku said:
DélioPT said:

Yes, that's the one.
I remember hearing about the movie not being good.

I can't recall now, but i think i saw other movies that i know they weren't good, but i still enjoyed watching them.
For example, people criticized Grown Ups with Adam Sandler, but i really thought the movie was funny.

The Island was pretty good, it was just misunderstood and A LOT of people were criticizing it because of it's twists. At least that's how I remember it, it wasn't by any means a bad movie. Actually it was one of Michael Bay's more "intelligent" movies. It's kind of funny how critics slammed him to be more smart and then slams him when he is..... Everyone just loves to hate on him XD

Grown Up's was kinda dumb but number 2 was funny. Big Daddy and Little Nicky will always be his best movies imo! The Wedding Singer is up there! Also I believe he directed the Deuce Bigalow films! Those movies are funny as hell!!! Defiantly worth a watch for the laughs, the first film was a commercial success where the 2nd one was considered too offensive XD

Comedies in general seem to get low ratings and no one ever seems to bitch about them. Pixels seems to be a very special case..... I mean everyone knew Paul Blart was for kids XD

Most of the movies i saw with starring were pretty good. The waterboy is his best film i saw with him. I laughed so hard when i saw it! :D

The second deuce bigalow was seen as offensive? Didn't know that.

Michael Bay really is a easy target! :)



I saw the movie today with my boyfriend and we both enjoyed it.



DélioPT said:

Most of the movies i saw with starring were pretty good. The waterboy is his best film i saw with him. I laughed so hard when i saw it! :D

The second deuce bigalow was seen as offensive? Didn't know that.

Michael Bay really is a easy target! :)


Haha apparently it was and those people say that the first Deuce Bigalo was a cute movie! Lmao I don't get people sometimes. Though I can see why some people say the first film was "cute" XD

Yeah a lot of them are. Have you seen Little Nicky or Big Daddy? Those are his best comedies in my opinon.
It's funny how comedies with bad ratings are normally universally loved by people. You know... sometimes they are actually funnier and over the top XD