Do you realize that those things you mention dont make a game better? I for example cant stand voice acting in games, so for me that would be worst than text.

Also PS1 model:

next CEO must love Nintendo more than money!

You're right, not even PS1 quality.

And they would make the game a shit ton better. All batle maps in Awakening are pretty much the same, nothing makes them stand out or unique.

Well, I agree, but a small tweak can involve more than most think. It should be easy to increase hardware-specs as long as architecture stays the same. So more CPU-cores, more GPU-cores, higher clovk speed or more memory is all possible in relatively short time, as long as it isn't so much, that the higher cooling need is impacted by the chosen form-factor. So more performance might be a possible tweak a new president might make. And finding the balance between features, power and price is right into the things a president has to decide. So a new president might accept higher price for more power. Other features (something like Miiverse, new ways of controlling, networking and so) are probably not changeable in such short time.

-I google and In 1982, Atari released a controller with a potentiometer-based analog joystick, On April 26, 1996,  Sony released a potentiometer-based analog joystick for use in Flight-Simulation games. But Nintendo released their Nintendo 64 controller on June 24, 1996 in Japan the new controller included a thumb-operated control stick, while On April 25, 1997,^[5] Sony released a similar analog stick.

-As I said, Dual touch screen was is innovation, even dual screen was only used by Nintendo it still innovation, but touch screen today are used everywhere.

-Because the technology was not advanced enough in that time for motion controls games, also we all know after Wii motion success on market Sony done Move and Microsoft done Kinect.

-Virtual Boy did 3D gaming when PS1 was launched. ;)

-Well Nintendo done something similar before PSP and PS3 with GBA and GC.

Basically all you wrote isn't true. ;)

Bad revil, very bad name, terrible marketing, high price, weak launch titles, software drought in 1st year, gamepad not used enuf..

Yes, he is basically saying that.

What's funny is the N64 was revealed to the public in spring 1994 with its controller, roughly 6 months before the PS1 launched and 2 years before that controller was released, is he really saying Nintendo R&D saw into the future and somehow came up with the N64 controller from looking at that?

The image i posted is smaller than a tv where you play ps1 games. The image you posted is bigger than a 3ds one.

You're in the minority.

I do remember the Gamecube.  I remember Nintendo underselling the specs, and they were decimated in boards everywhere that they had a lower polygon count than PS2 and Xbox(for those that don't remember, Sony and MSFT announced the theoretical max, where Nintendo announced real world).  Gamecube had memory cards with 1/8th the capcity at the same price as Sony and Microsoft's memory cards.  This made it difficult for some multiplatform games to save properly on GC   Also, Nintendo utilized a lower capciity media drive, and made the console unable to play DVD's.  Then Nintendo swore up an down that nobody wanted to play DVD's, or needed HD graphics or online play.  Its these things that chase away consumers who like those things, and it makes the console seem less capabale to the average consumer.

Being a computer company and saying online play, and HD graphics are unecessary is anti-technology.  You can't say it isn't.  They were innovative with the NES, and SNES.  They were innovative on N64 in some respects, though going against CD's was the tipping point.  This is 1996 remember.  Next we got the Gamecube, which was the perfect illustration of what I am talking about above in Nintendo's approach.  Nintendo still knew how to hype things at the time.  I rememeber hearing that the same people who made Jurassic Park (a big deal at the time) were working on the N64.

Since then, only the Wii controller was innovative, but why couldn't we also have HD graphics and online play?  The Wii U controller isn't really an innovation as it was a misfire.  I'll take your word on handhelds. I'm not really interested there.

Fair enough.  But the PS2 hype machine for graphics was something we haven't witnesses before or after.

C'mon, this is a stretch.  Nobody knew about this but for a handful of people.

Do you realize different people have different tastes.  Nintendo's problem is they are appealing to a small group of people with similar tastes.