They had something for this fall that they could have announced, you know what they did with that? They announced it a week before the show, apparently a huge mistake because now people are acting like it doesn't exist or that Sony not showing it at the conference makes that conference horrible. TLG doesn't look like it changed much because it was never actually running on PS3 hardware, the footage shown in 09 was running at a couple FPS and then sped up for the trailer. Yes the FF VII Remake trailer had no gameplay, just like the ReCore trailer had no gameplay, just like Star Fox last year didn't have any gameplay or SMTxFE when it was originally announced, CG trailers aren't great (though the FF VII trailer was awesomely done) but in this case it's the simple fact that this exists that makes it such a massive announcement. And I'm not going to discuss the whole freaking Shenmue situation again, suffice to say that I'm sick of people trying to bash Sony for actually helping to make it happen instead of bashing everyone else for not doing anything in the last 14 years.

And I don't have to ask myself what they are giving me cause I know that, yes like I said Sonys first party output in 2015 is slim (though I'm still getting the UC Collection and Rime as well as NMS and Persona 5 this year, all of which have at least some sort of exclusivity on PS) but starting 2016 the whole situation looks extremely different with SFV, UC4 and R&C coming in the first half of the year and Horizon, TLG and GT7 also looking at a 2016 release. There's also smaller games like Dreams and Rigs (though that's likely Morpheus exclusive) that are 2016 as well. All of those are just the already confirmed games, so I don't see how Sony didn't give us anything solid or concrete, even if that stuff is a little farther away. Even Shenmue 3 already has a release window they are aiming at (late 2017), FFVII Remake is literally the only announcement from the conference where there is no solid information of at least a release window of the game.

ive seen the stats youre talking about and ive seen the lists, dont worry.

what if i were to tell you that the wii in 2008 had 150 exclusives for the year (im pulling that number jsut as an example, but i honestly wouldnt be surprised if it were somewhere around that number. the wii had a fucking shit ton of exclusives), whereas the ps3 and 360 each had somewhere around 50 exclusives.

what if i sent you a list of titles that actually verified that? would that tell you anything meaningful? would you say, "damn the wii does have the most exclusives and clearly has the best lineup with all the games it has coming out for it." is that what you would say? im just curious. im trying to make a point here.

the list would look something like this:
wii: purr pals, real hero fire fighters, build a bear workshop, survivor, spy fox in dry cereal, imagine: babyz, attack of the movies 3d, etc.

sure, theyre all exclusives.. but what does that really mean? would you say that the wii had nothing lined up for the holiday, or would you recognize these titles as delivering the goods to the gamers?

Do you really have to take jabs at people?