I feel like even that is a little unrealistic. Nintendo always has critically acclaimed 3D Zelda games. I don't see how that could randomly change unless they were rushing the game, which they clearly aren't.

I have no problems with them not being serious. My problem is that they are bad. Like they are poorly written. TP and SS had bad stories. OoT barely had one. MM barely had one. WW's was neat, but definitely not the pinnacle of story telling. TP and SS was them trying, and they weren't good. It'd rather no story than another melodramatic, plot hole-ridden mess anyday.

I have also really enjoyed all their stories, even Link's Awakening where you find out the whole thing was a dream.

Content cut and sold as DLC on day one, locked on disc.
Amiibo fest that unlocks sidequests, customes and weapons.

That it will only be 10x better than the combined library of Microsoft, Sony, and all third party games and that it will only be 1/10th as good as Half Life Three Episode 4.

Link's Awakening barely had one though. I basically just started and then ended. There was no plot progression at all. You just play the game and then *poof* it's all a... You know. That's not a story. That's an ending. Nothing of consequence happens in that game until the end. They could have put that ending on literally any other Zelda game, and it would have made no difference, aside from the obvious hints like the chain chomp existing in that game.

Ultrashroomz said: It ends up being an HD remake of Zelda CDi.

Well excuuuuse me!

True enough, it was still enjoyable though.

Less than good game, with average to boring and monotonous sidequest and map to explore, and a "to be continued" kind of ending.

The game was fine. Just not because of some great narrative. It was a neat ending to an even neater game.