The cost is in response from the thread....... 

Apparently there is a bunch of negativity "all of a sudden," that's the "cost" I'm referring to. 

I kinda agree with this.

Don't worry.... E3 is around the corner, and SOny will probably destroy the competition in Q4 lineup like they usually do

^--- Anyone notice who all are in this thread and trying to bash Sony?

I think we can officially ignore the negativity now.

hunter_alien said: Don't worry.... E3 is around the corner, and SOny will probably destroy the competition in Q4 lineup like they usually do

I look forward to this. Very much so. 

Not really sure what that has do with my post, but I would call it a nice gesture.  But of course people would complain about games not being exclusive.  Like how a lot of people don't consider half the Xbox library because the games are on the pc as well.

My point is that exclusives make up such a small part of the overall libraries these days that they aren't as big of a deal as people on these forums make them.  There are tons of games coming out, people can find all sorts of games to play, they don't have to be exclusive in order to play them.

Why can't I ever seem to make explosive threads like this?

My next thread will be highly controversial. Mark my words.

hunter_alien said: Don't worry.... E3 is around the corner, and SOny will probably destroy the competition in Q4 lineup like they usually do

Not a chance in heck they will destroy the competition this fall (in NA/UK).  Halo is by far Microsofts strongest brand, and I just don't think Sony has a magic rabbit in their hat that can rival Halo.

That said, Tomb Raider and Forza are just fluff. 

Microsoft operates on hype. But the kicker is that 90% of all titles are on both consoles and in alot of those cases, they run or look better on the PS4. Therefore, the take a handful of exclusive titles and hype them up to high heaven.

Bloodborne is not for me, but to each his own.