mZuzek said:
Volterra_90 said: Metroid Prime 1 beaten, moving into Hunters. Controls are a bit clumsy in this one, but is still fairly enjoyable. Never played it tbh, I don't think it's a bad game. Still waiting for a Federation Force price cut to see if it's that bad xD. |
Are you playing them all in the timeline order?
I actually never played Hunters, but I heard a lot of bad things about it. Who knows, maybe one day I'll get the chance (and will) to see if it's as bad as people say.
|
I am, yeah. I want to finish the Prime saga before Pokemon releases, working hard on it xD.
Tbh, it's not really a goof Metroid game, it certainly lacks more exploration. But, well, it's decent enough as its own. But if you're looking for a Metroid classic experience, it's probably not your game.
Einsam_Delphin said:
Volterra_90 said:
Why not both? They can take a Splatoon approach. I mean, optional motion controls, not mandatory, and both well implemented. I'd appreciate that Nintendo kept motion controls in some games. I don't imagine myself playing Splatoon without them, tbh. I don't feel they are inferior in this case. Actually, they made me better. And if someone doesn't feel comfortable with them, they can always change and play with the sticks.
|
Like I said, if there's no motion controls then there's no chance for games like Starfox Zero to happen, so I'd rather they not exist even despite being good in a few cases. I'll bet my mama you've played shooters on sticks before, so I can definitely imagine you playing Splatoon that way and liking it. 
|
Your mama is safe, yeah xD. I wouldn't have trouble playing without motion controls, but it could feel a bit lacking for me. If Nintendo doesn't force us motion controls, we can have both. But Nintendo is always doing weird stuff, so I can understand your concern about it xD. The ideal solution would be having both, well implemented, in ganes that benefit for motion controls imo.