TruckOSaurus said:
Alright, please explain to me how a dead person can give consent? |
Alright please explain why you need adult and consent terminology as a basis to determine love ? Tell me why you guys following that " words "
TruckOSaurus said:
Alright, please explain to me how a dead person can give consent? |
Alright please explain why you need adult and consent terminology as a basis to determine love ? Tell me why you guys following that " words "
HollyGamer said:
Panther 111 : " And therefore to protect humans, no one should be allowed marriage " |
There are plenty of people born of gay marriages. Lesbians couples can be artificially inseminated, gay couples can use a surrogate mom. Of course, there's also the option of adoption for couples for want to have children.
Signature goes here!
reggin_bolas said:
Faulty comparisson. You're meandering from the topic of marriage as a social institution to persecution and harm of ethnic groups. It does not follow that the right to be free from harm leads to the right marry. You can't show a logical connection between gay's right to be free from bodily harm and persecution to the right to marry. |
The comparison is hardly faulty. You are just focusing on the physical aspect. Though, for the sake of it, replace the Holocaust example with one like online bullying. No physical harm, but still something that has a negative impact on a person. Telling someone that they don't have an equal right to something like marriage simply because they don't want to marry someone of the opposite sex has the same impact. It essentially says "we don't believe you are good enough to enjoy this the same way someone else would" and impedes on the basic human right that you yourself posted.
Panther111 said:
|
Yeah, thank you for kind word
HollyGamer said:
Alright please explain why you need adult and consent terminology as a basis to determine love ? Tell me why you guys following that " words " |
Wrong answer. Try again.
Signature goes here!
HollyGamer said:
Yeah people does need to be treated equally and fair, but how come human right able to judge that??? How come you use "Human Right " as a basis and a proclamation to defend human right. Like i said if man can change the law, then the law it self is a flaw. |
By which you obviously say that laws must come from god, or Allah in your case. But all those godly rules from all gods ever were made by men.
An all powerful god could just speak to all people at the same time and dictate them his rules if he existed and wanted humans to live by his rules. Why would he only speak to 1 prophet or a few "chosen ones" ? I don't buy it.
Ka-pi96 said:
Yep, we are good friends and that won't be changing While I don't necessarily agree with you you are at least putting up actual reasons for your beliefs and you certainly aren't irrational about it. And even though you do seem slightly against gay marriage at least you aren't ignorant to the reasons for it. |
. Friends
HollyGamer said:
Alright please explain why you need adult and consent terminology as a basis to determine love ? Tell me why you guys following that " words " |
Consent is important because the act requires two people. If I love you and I decide to have sex with you without your consent that is rape. Rape is taking away someone's right to decide for themselves. That is why consent is important.
Panther111 said:
|
While I do disagree with the user you replied to, you should probably refrain from name calling. Of course, that line may have been crossed a few times during the course of this thread with other users but I haven't been keeping a close eye XD
Hiku said:
I'll give it three months, tops. |
The bond in Polar Bear avatars is much strong than you think ;P