|
Chazore said: Why is that a good thing to have someone forming a monopoly?. |
PlayStation on top is the best for the industry.
|
Chazore said: Why is that a good thing to have someone forming a monopoly?. |
PlayStation on top is the best for the industry.
| ethomaz said: PlayStation on top is the best for the industry. |
From what we're seeing it doesn't appear to be for Nintendo/Xbox gamers and for someone like myself either.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
A gaming focused console wins, what a suprise?
but even if the xbox one wouldnt launched with the kinect and with no DRM plans they would have lost. The ps4 would still be more powerfull, and it has a Bigger and more diverse library like japanese games, as well as the better features like installing and playing games at the same time. And Share play and backwards compatibility with PSnow.
| JazzB1987 said: I dont know what they nailed lol.
lucky coincidence? how is that even a logical statement? did they just stumble on the PS4 with its stratigic plan and marketing plan in the office and say "hmm why not release this thing?". the reality is they been working on this console since 2007, and they worked hard. the sold so much refers to it breaking records, they expected very good sales but not the monster it became. which was logical, you cant predict that a massive hit will be a massive hit. |
answers are in bold..... geez

Chazore said:
Why is that a good thing to have someone forming a monopoly?. |
they dont have a monopoly and they wont this gen. but its good they are the leaders because they are the only company to make a console focused on making quality games rather than push gimicks and useless accessories to try sell their consoles. and they are the only one that are trying to actually innovate in the gaming space.

Chazore said:
From what we're seeing it doesn't appear to be for Nintendo/Xbox gamers and for someone like myself either. |
Why what are you missing that MS or nintendo could have brought to the table had they been market leaders?
DRM box? more motion control games? taking more third party games off other systems?
They didn't "nail" anything. They took advantage of Microsoft's epic blunder. I think we know what really happened:
"Sony changed its E3 2013 presentation after Microsoft’s blunder"
http://ps4daily.com/2014/07/sony-e3-2013-presentation/
Not to mention the fact the PS4 was originally going to ship with its camera for a higher price and you're extremely ignorant and naive if you think that Sony didn't also have a very "all digital" future complete with DRM.
Hiku said:
Not true. |
This never gets old.

Hiku said:
Not true. |

bananaking21 said:
|
If Nintendo has pushed out so many quality games despite apparently not focusing on it imagine how many amazing games we'd have if they did!
