Well, the bigger the PS4 market share  the harder it becomes for MS to moneyhat games and by harder I mean the moneyhats become more expensive.

It's a good way to put it.

It would have already pass 50% VGChartz sales havent gone passed march yet its now may 1.

Oh, and now you have a new opinion. One that says that your opinion is a correct fact. Interesting.
I´ll give you the first point though, there´s speculation on my opinion, that´s a fact. Everything else, is your opinion.

And let´s stop this here, please, it´s getting funny in a bad way.

And to expand on that, the PS3 had an insane variety of First Party titles that were fantastic?

Well, aren't you full of rainbows and sunshine. Obviously a lot of PS fans will rejouce and it will be easier for PS4 to get more exclusive games.

50% for a Playstation console = heaven. Just like the other eras. Damn, even the PS3 had a lot of quality games that couldn't be played anywhere else, maybe just not as many as the previous consoles.

I would actually argue that developers who make games of genres that don't perform well on the XBO will just make their games for the PS4. This is especially true for 3rd party Japanese developers. As for 3rd party western developers, they'll still make games for both consoles, but the PS4 will get special treatment via bundles a la Batman: Arkham Knight.

This almost feels as if I've won an oscar.

I can't figure out why Sony Playstations are so popular relative to their competition.

Saying "it´s getting funny in a bad way." is an attempt to deflect the argument and make me doubt my previous claims because you have no rebuttal. Unfortunately for you, I am completly assurred in my stance. Since any one can simply search the terms I used and find the definitions I cited.

If you had any counter, you would have employed them, explaining how it wasn't downplay or bias. But you failed to do so. You even conceded that I was correct in my assertion of speculation.

You further attempt dismisal, by incorrectly claiming that the bolded is an opinion as well. 

Because EVEN if you disagree with that my claim is a fact, the statement itself cannot be an opinion. 

Disagreeing with a fact does not make it any less factual.

The only way a fact can be shown to be incorrect is by disproving it, something you did not do.

The only way to show the fact is not objective, is to point out the subjective assertions within the claim itself.

You have done neither.

The only way you can endeavor to do this is

*prove how your claim contains no Bias, because my claim was that Bias exists in your claim(which is not the same as describing that Bias, something that would be an opinion)

 *prove how your claim does not Downplay, which will be really hard because "relevant" is a synonym for importance, which is what the defintion of downplay involves.

On a sidenote: Don't take this personal, I just call it like I see it. (Objectively, in this case). Especially, when people make paragraphed claims. Few people are actually prepared to back up what they say. And rely on repeated tactics of dismisall, deflection, Ad Hominem attacks etc.