My point is that in this country at one time kids were married around the ages of puberty and that was two to three years shy. Thats pretty much it. Im not saying anything is right or wrong.

Good for them, they don't want money that is accepted legally like 95% of the world (100% in developed countries). Less money means less jobs, less financial standing and overall worst to US all together since bankruptcy is resolved by Government . With Nutty Religious hypocrites like these, It makes sense why China and other countries get most of the businesses. I would imagine the next for them will be signing bills allowing businesses to reject customers from race, minorites, gender, religions, disabled. Continuing to throw US to the Stone ages. Also this fuels the Anti- Americanism globally. The implications of this is larger than their ignorant brains to process.

Fair enough - I came off a bit harsh there, sorry man.

It seems to me as if the company reprimanded him for it. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/18/1285691/-Chick-fil-A-CEO-now-regrets-dragging-the-company-into-anti-equality-morass The backlash seemed to have worked in that case. Also, as you notice even in states where there are no anti-discriminatory laws for homosexuals discrimination is not at Jim Crow levels, nowhere near that. My state - Pennsylvania - doesn't have anti-discriminatory laws for sexuality and I've never heard or read an instance where somebody was outright prevented from shopping somewhere here. Workplace discrimination might exist, but the laws barely work for that either because it is so covert. 

I didn't say it was only caused by de jure segregation. I said it was so debilitating because of de jure segregation. People had no other alternatives. All businesses were mandated to have seperate facilities for blacks and whites. Compare the northern states, which didn't do this but also didn't have anti-discrimination laws (or at least some of them didn't.) Sure blacks and whites were segregated, but not anymore than say varying ethnicities of whites were. Much of the workplace discrimination ended in the 1930's with the Congress of Industrial Organizations integrated African-Americans into their unions. Please substantiate your claims with evidence. Where is this widespread discrimination in states with no anti-discrimination laws for sexuality? 

Actually in today's legal system some states have anti-discrimination laws for sexuality and others do not. So it isn't that abstract and theoretical. 

Right China gets most of the business because of Indian's new law.  Wish I wasn't so ignorant, here I thought it was mostly about economics, trade policy and labor rates.

No worries, bro.

What? I said "China and other countries", which part don't you agree on? This bill will affect the trade agreement with other countries, even if its just a state bill. It is "about economics, trade policy and labor rates", the reduction of money flow affects them all.  (as this bill affect the trade relations,politically).

I understand where you are coming from with bankruptcy but it seems like you think the small amounts of money consumers wouldn't spend at -lets call them discriminating businesses- isn't going to be spent at all. 

Russia should be in ashes by now if policy conerning LGBT was such a major factor in trade relations, along with every other country in the world that has civil rights or human rights issues.  Money talks louder than social issues.

Sorry, not trying to be a jack-ass but your grammer in the original post made it harder to follow.

I quote you without writing what I was planning to answer to that...So wait!

I would be ok with a society where people can express their opinions and preferences inside their properties.  Just that.

People's opinions is something governments shouldn't mess with.