By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Yoda on 27 March 2015
Edit Thread
nanorazor said:
The_Yoda said:
nanorazor said:
Good for them, they don't want money that is accepted legally like 95% of the world (100% in developed countries). Less money means less jobs, less financial standing and overall worst to US all together since bankruptcy is resolved by Government . With Nutty Religious hypocrites like these, It makes sense why China and other countries get most of the businesses. I would imagine the next for them will be signing bills allowing businesses to reject customers from race, minorites, gender, religions, disabled. Continuing to throw US to the Stone ages. Also this fuels the Anti- Americanism globally. The implications of this is larger than their ignorant brains to process.

Right China gets most of the business because of Indian's new law.  Wish I wasn't so ignorant, here I thought it was mostly about economics, trade policy and labor rates.

What? I said "China and other countries", which part don't you agree on? This bill will affect the trade agreement with other countries, even if its just a state bill. It is "about economics, trade policy and labor rates", the reduction of money flow affects them all.  (as this bill affect the trade relations,politically).

 


I understand where you are coming from with bankruptcy but it seems like you think the small amounts of money consumers wouldn't spend at -lets call them discriminating businesses- isn't going to be spent at all. 

Russia should be in ashes by now if policy conerning LGBT was such a major factor in trade relations, along with every other country in the world that has civil rights or human rights issues.  Money talks louder than social issues.

Sorry, not trying to be a jack-ass but your grammer in the original post made it harder to follow.