Gamers who say there's nothing wrong with infinite amounts of remasters: "Remasters take no effort, time, or resources on behalf of the developers. So what's the problem?"

Insider: "Remastering is tough so you'll get this one first and then the other for more $$$ when it's ready cus this is a really intensive process"

Naaa, I don't think I've read a single comment on any forum anywhere on the internet where someone wrote: 'I think there's nothing wrong with an 'infinite' amount of remasters.' Of course for your argument to have any weight it pays to start from such an extreme position.

That's what an HD remake should be, not just a 1080p 60fps upgrade.

I'm exaggerating for effect of course, but I've seen several people on this forum say that there's no such thing as too many remasters, so it's not far off tbh

I dont mind remasters at all, but i dont like remasters that dont include all of the previous games also.... like the Borderlands collection... I wont buy it because it doesnt include 1. I would buy lots of remasters, but only if they are the full set, otherwise i feel its not worth buying them.

It really isn't a problem. In fact it's a welcome addition.

Not buying this garbage.

Well that's pretty straightforward for you then.

Sorry.

Because they get less of your money that way...