Looks gorgeous!

Why do this? What was the point of bringing in Pokemon?

So... The Order 1887? The Order 1886 2? The Order 1886: The Sequel? Is there any way that the sequel's name is gonna be good?

It's rather obvious that I didn't, but I've heard enough about it to know that it's not a good game. Rather, it's just another graphically intensive game that doesn't really shine that much anywhere else.

The Sydney one looks so good. I hope we get some openworld game in a setting like that sometime.

Yes, 5 regions and 600 more Pokemon is less changes than smoke.

Great now this is gonna turn into an order vs pokemon thread cause some people can't stay on topic...

OT: Hope its true, there was room for improvement in the first game and hopefully Ready at Dawn takes note.

No it's not obvious. Also, why are you going by word of mouf from reviewers and such instead of making your own judgement? The game is actually good. Although reviewers do have valid points about the game's flaws, they were also a bit too critical of such attributes that may not be a negative to others (QTE's, MP's, etc) I'm not criticizing you about you not liking the game. Just curious as to why you don't think it's a "good" game. There are plenty of good games that has bad sequels too. I'm sure you know that though.

Assassin Creed will try to be like this without the TESLA part? So you might get a sandbox based in Industrial London. Assuming they don't mess it up. 

Will they have the nerve to do it?