| gatito said: It's the hype generation. |
Can I use this?
Feel free to check out my stream on twitch

| gatito said: It's the hype generation. |
Can I use this?
Feel free to check out my stream on twitch

I would also like to add that I've played my PS4 an awful lot this past year. My PS3 went untouched pretty much until Metal Gear Solid 4. In short, I think the PS4's first year games have been a lot better than the PS3's, which points to a better generation so far imo
| slashydrunkard said: Something must be said about backwards compatibility here! BC is out of style now because of how bloody difficult emulation is for recent gen games. You expect a certain experience with console games. The only way to make that experience with BC absolutely perfect would be to include the old hardware alongside the new, which isn't very cost effective nowadays. If you guys remember, PS2 had PS1 hardware inside as well, which made perfect BC possible. Everyone knew why the Wii was BC with GameCube games (it was simply an overclocked GC and you know it!). Could you imagine including PS1, 2 AND 3 hardware in the PS4 for a perfect BC video gaming experience? And for the alternative to work (emulation), you would need a system that's extremely powerful. Even godly rigs have issues with PS3 and XB360 emulation. Sure, those machines can run the games, but the experience is not smooth and is prone to failure. You can't have older games crashing and performing below the standard on consoles when people are well aware of the game performing a certain way on the older systems. Of course it's true that companies are capitalizing on this by doing HD remasters and re-releases, but I'm seriously not complaining about HD remasters because they introduce aging series to newcomers and make those older games even more playable for us older gamers. It's just not cost effective these days. |
I would agree with that but Sony could do PS1 and PS2 BC but they don't because it's all about selling remasters and HD remakes.
At best, they should have sold an add-on module with the Cell/RSX system in it that connects to the PS4. The x86 architecture is fast enough to handle the subsystems necessary to emulate the PS3 properly, due to having 512MB of the memory it needs.


| slashydrunkard said: Everyone knew why the Wii was BC with GameCube games (it was simply an overclocked GC and you know it!) |
Well, not just an overclocked GC. In terms of CPU/GPU it was the same architecture with 50% more speed, yeah. But technically, it also had more than twice as much RAM and support for full-sized discs, which solved two of the primary shortcomings of the GC.
Wii's selling point was the gameplay though, not the graphics.
Imagine all the games being pushed back a year or so. Imagine the polish and extra time which was as we see needed for a bunch of these games. That's what should've happened. Sony rushed their system and MS reciprocated. We would've had way more launch games and the generation would be just starting. I think it would've been almost perfect.
| TheSting said: Imagine all the games being pushed back a year or so. Imagine the polish and extra time which was as we see needed for a bunch of these games. That's what should've happened. Sony rushed their system and MS reciprocated. We would've had way more launch games and the generation would be just starting. I think it would've been almost perfect. |
Based on the amount of stuff Nintendo have lined up for this year, I feel like Big N was actually expecting the two of them to take the cue from their first year struggles and actually do that.
You certainly make a lot of good points here. Though personally I like the Zelda art style. Also you say no backward compatibility, which definitely pissed me off with the other 2, but Nintendo has backward compatibility still, as well as free online, and their online is starting to get good now. My main complaint with Nintendo is how slow the games come, but they can only do so much. Meanwhile the other two have money and 3rd parties on their side yet they're still basically where Nintendo was in its first Wii U year. Even worse when just looking at first party. 7th gen there was very much a reason, countless reasons really, to own every system, even at this point in that gen. This gen is off to a much slower start, and thus far it feels like I've bought Nintendo for its first party and really only need one of the others, depending on which I think will have better potential, which at this point seems like PS4 but really neither are drawing me in with anything they have to offer. Just promises, and I don't have $400 to spend on promises at the moment. By the time the 8th gen is done though, I think we'll be pleased with it, it just won't beat the 7th gen for most people, or even the 6th. Maybe not even the 5th. Let's give the companies time to do their thing.
mountaindewslave said:
but nothing was particularly good about Dragon Age: Inquisition. it is just 'okay', a good time-killer. I think the OP is totally right, it's been lackluster indeed. too much cashing in on old franchises or the fact that gamers do not have a lot of choices recently in terms of new releases, publishers being lazy and safe |
Didn't get the part where I said I loved it right? I don't care if you thought it was only okay, I thought it was great and that's all that matters. No game is perfect, they always have something to improve.
Yet, for ever 15 games released, if I like just 1 of those it is surely a success. Many might think so far this gen has sucked but there may be many who are enjoying themselfs with some really good creative games released in the last year and a half. I mean no matter how many issues Battlefield 4 had at release, there are people who probably still love it.
Hmm, pie.
There are a couple reasons why I haven't jumped to this generation yet.
Yes, the games thus far haven't really impressed me, that combined with a hefty backlog from last gen is one reason. The only single game that really makes me want to jump to this gen is Mario Kart 8. This is the only game that I feel the need to play. The rest is just meh, I can totally wait a couple years to play what's best out of them. And let me stress it - I'm ignoring every single cross-gen game on previous gen consoles!
Second reason, just as important, is the price of games. PS3 games were more expensive than PC games, but the price was acceptable. PS4 games are so much more expensive though!! I can't justify the purchase of such expensive games. I can't see the value of these games meeting the price tag. And not only is the asking price increased, but we get bombarded with DLCs. This massive increase in price makes me think about switching to PC gaming more and more, especially since I have to buy a new PC this year. I have to think hard and do the math, cause a PC may mean some massive savings for me combined with better looking games.
The third reason is that I'm moving out now and have to renovate my new flat, so I can't spend much money on games
Vita games costs me enough 
Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!
My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/
My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.
| McDonaldsGuy said: Anyone else agree? |
I agree. So far this generation seems uninspired to me, specially related to software. There´s nothing really new, nothing we already saw/experienced before. Just better graphics are not enough. We need new ideas, but those doesn´t seem to sell well so developers prefer to stick to old stuff and fill them with annoying microtransations.
The only device this generation that ´s bringing me constant joy is the 3DS, with its good cathalog of japanese games and weird but cool indie games.
