Too true, and that causes problems, like the one we're discussing here. I remember how bird flu and swine flu was going to kill tens of million as well; yet nothing much happened. Media reports on health and disease should be either covered by or approved by some sort of panel or person(s) who have actual insights in these fields. Tech reports, sports coverage and even something as unimportant as celebrities and entertainment has specialists who are very well versed on their respective subjects but it seems like they let any old fool cover health issues (I should know, my girlfriend's father is a medical freelance journalist and writes about stuides, he says that almost everyone he has worked with were clueless and so were their editorial staff).

Holy shit! Human stupidity really knows no bounds.

GMOs have an infinitely greater effect on the environment than the do human health...in fact, there is really virtually no risk to human health from GMOs aside from a) potential change in pesticide use (although I believe pesticides undergo rigorous safety testing); and b) potentially triggering allergies in foods that wouldn't normally trigger allergies.

A GMO is just a genetically modified organism...for some reason, "genetically modified" triggers some irrational, innate fear in people

Thanks, I try. ;)

.

Europe isn't concerned in the least about any health dangers of GMOs. They banned them (partially) because:

-Many varieties are  known to expand agressively, and can cause <pollution> (cross-polination) with local varieties.

-GMOs are very productive, which could incite local farmers to take them instead of any varieties typical to a certain region: The EU likes to protect certain food productions as cultral heritage. Also, they want to discourage massif monocultures, as to protect the landscape.

-Certain GMO varieties were created to specifically used with a poison which they are immune to. These are usually harmless, if used correctly, but malinformed farmers tend to use them in extravagant quantaties, which can have negative effects (more on the environnement than on humans, however.) Also, if a single substance is used too frequently, it can let superweeds evolve, which are hard to get rid of.

In fact, the importation of GMO products is fully legal. Immense quantaties of <banned> soy come into the continent from South America, mostly to feed cattle. B

just found this topid and still reading so i dont know if its been answered,  But im pretty sure its a preservative agent to prevent the growth of deadly microbes within the vaccine.

Well virus always targeting human body by distorting human RNA on their cell. Many virus like AIDS etc targeting human blood cell and their white blood cell. The Vaccine it self is still a virus but with controllable cause that let the body learning and creating some anti virus. If Virus can altered our cell RNA then science can change the proprietary of Virus then it's easy to get some theory that human can indirectly affecting human genes.

this. like vaccines there is zero proof that GMOs are unsafe (in fact they are generally better, and better for you than "natural" food (which has been genetically modified over time anyway)), and large amounts of verifiable evidence that they are safe.

they only problem i have with GMOs, is IP trolling, laws.

How does that reply make any sense at all.

First off all show me how vaccination has no negative impact on our bodies. then give me a credible source on that and if you find something then give me evidence that that study was NOT paid by a lobby etc.
(I mean you als demand evidence right? So I also do it)

Then how is that cruel selfish or utterly illogical. A doubt is a valid reason especially when the doubt exists for a reason.
Everyone knows that vaccination does do harm AND good. (As do blood transfusions that cause cancer and thrombosis and even more crap.) So even being ill for 2 weeks thanks to the vaccine (which is not rare at all)  is a good enough reason to not give that shit to kids especially when there is more tan 1 type of vaccine for the same  flu/ whatever and you only have access to the shit-tier one.
E.g.   The german government and the Bundeswehr got "highend vaccine" the population got the crappy one and you could not at all get the one politicians or soldiers got.

Also in case of flu etc. If you get vaccinated but I dont then you have no risk at all. No person that gets it has any risk at all. Only the people that dont want that crap will "suffer". When they touch doorknobs and then their food etc.  And if people would have a brain shit like a flu would not even spread.

Sneeze into your shoulder/armbit instead of your hands.
Dont touch your mouth or nose and if you do just use the back of your hand.
Wash your hands.
Dont go out when you know you are ill
Do a japanese "hello bow" instead of giving hands.
Wear this


Every kind of flu or whatever would just die out if people would stop spreading it for a month or so. We should educate  people isntead of giving them crap.
Even my sister (who is a nurse) is idiotic and tells her little kids to put their hands in front of their mouths when they sneeze or cough.....