By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Sony, MS and Nintendo online stores should be operated like a Bank

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
Aeolus451 said:


If I own a previous gen console, a ps2 for example and have a ps2 or ps1 game, sony can't take away or prevent me from playing it. I can sell the console and game to anyone in any country, they will be able to play regardless of how sony feels about it. That's owning it. 

I can do the same with current gen consoles. This is me in the future and shit hasn't really changed all that much. Physical copy = to owning it while digital = not owning it.

That is the License or the right to play that game. If you owning the game legally means owning the IP and thus all the rights for that game. This license is physically tied to the disc. Therefore when you sell the disc, you are simply selling your copy of the license. This is wh duplication is illegal if you are selling both copies because you are creating another license.

When the license is tied to an account, that account can have the license revoked. Thus regardless of whatever disc you use, you won't be able to play said game. And reselling the disc will be worthless cause it would not have an account associated with it. Or rather, your account would be associated with it.

 

In fact, this is also the reason why console versions of said game can't be played on a different console.

I.e COD for Xbox, is a license to play COD on the Xbox Platform, therefore it cannot be played on tthe PS or Nintendo platform, because the player does not own these licenses.

 

The ONLY difference between physical and digital games is that a digital game is a digital license as opposed to a license tied to a physical disc. The license itself is digital. This is why if you own the game and not the console, it is just a hunk of decorated plastic.

This is in response to the bold part. That's rarely done with consoles and it's highly frowned upon. MMO's are really the only ones able to do that on consoles. MS tried that with the xbone and it greatly backfired on them. 

To the second bold part. Wrong. The differences (yes, that's plural) between physical and digital games are...

You can't legally resell, trade-in your digital copy but with the physical copy you can. You can't sell something you don't own, right?

DIgital copies are not collectable but physical copies are. 

Digital copies are locked to an account but physical copies mostly aren't. 

If you are banned or locked from your account, you can never download your digital game again if you delete it and in some cases, you can't play the game again on that account. Physical copies for the most part don't have this issue. 

Digital is anti-consumer and physical is not. 

 

I gave plenty of differences between physical copies of games and digital copies of games when you said there's ONLY one. I could of gave you more examples of differences between the two but I have other threads to post and converse in.  Digital games will never be the future of gaming. An option or alternative to physical copies, yes but never the sole choice. 

 





Around the Network
Aeolus451 said:

This is in response to the bold part. That's rarely done with consoles and it's highly frowned upon. MMO's are really the only ones able to do that on consoles. MS tried that with the xbone and it greatly backfired on them. 

To the second bold part. Wrong. The differences (yes, that's plural) between physical and digital games are...

You can't legally resell, trade-in your digital copy but with the physical copy you can. You can't sell something you don't own, right?

DIgital copies are not collectable but physical copies are. 

Digital copies are locked to an account but physical copies mostly aren't. 

If you are banned or locked from your account, you can never download your digital game again if you delete it and in some cases, you can't play the game again on that account. Physical copies for the most part don't have this issue. 

Digital is anti-consumer and physical is not. 

 

I gave plenty of differences between physical copies of games and digital copies of games when you said there's ONLY one. I could of gave you more examples of differences between the two but I have other threads to post and converse in.  Digital games will never be the future of gaming. An option or alternative to physical copies, yes but never the sole choice. 

The ownership of software(concepts in general) is different from ownership of physical entities.

There is a difference between ownership of a game(Something only the owner of the IP has) and ownership of the license to play a game.

Everything you have listed as a difference is simply just another aspect of limitations of tieing a license to an account rather than a physical disc.

The only thing you are collecting is a decorated plastic disc in a decorated plastic box.

There is nothing stopping you from trading virtual licenses other than the vendors. If you owned the game, you would be able to distribute licenses, just as if you owned any other content.

You buy a license that gives you the right to play a copy of the game. G



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank