By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Whos gona sell better, MM3D or ALBW?

 

Which game gona sell better?

Majoras mask 3D 88 62.86%
 
a link between worlds? 34 24.29%
 
see results 18 12.86%
 
Total:140
Frogger on 05 February 2015

I think about the same.



Around the Network
Jumpin on 05 February 2015
Samus Aran said:
LipeJJ said:

MM3D easily. The game is already tracking better on pre-orders than OoT3D's FW in the US. ALBW was the game nobody wanted, except loyal and oldschool fans.

It's still a far better game than OoT ever will be. Gamers are so predictable, the first in a series is always the best. In reality, they're almost always the worst.

The NES Zeldas are the worst 2D Zeldas and the N64 Zeldas are the worst 3D ones as far as I'm concerned.



The N64 Zeldas are the best 3D ones, the worst are the DS Celdas and Twilight Princess.

I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Dr.Vita on 05 February 2015

I will go with Majora's Mask.




Dr.Vita talks about Playstation Vita in 2016!
Playstation Vita Media Create Sales (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016)
Playstation Vita Japan Retail Software Sales (2013 vs 2014 vs 2015 + 2015 LTD Edition)
Prediction: Nothing will outsell PSP anymore (except Playstation home consoles)

DanneSandin on 05 February 2015

ALBW will sell better. So far, NO remake has ever out sold the original, and what did MM sell on N64? 2m? No more than 3m I think. Therefore it's only logical to conclude that ALBW will sell more - that game will hit 3m sooner or later. Don't think that internet hype amongst Zelda fans will translate into massive sales for MM3D



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

XanderXT on 05 February 2015

I think Majora's Mask 3D will sell more. It has the backing of the New 3DS after all.



Around the Network
Neodegenerate on 05 February 2015

ALBW gets my vote. Both games will benefit from being part of bundles in their launches, but the remake won't have as great of legs.



Samus Aran on 05 February 2015
Jumpin said:
Samus Aran said:

It's still a far better game than OoT ever will be. Gamers are so predictable, the first in a series is always the best. In reality, they're almost always the worst.

The NES Zeldas are the worst 2D Zeldas and the N64 Zeldas are the worst 3D ones as far as I'm concerned.


The N64 Zeldas are the best 3D ones, the worst are the DS Celdas and Twilight Princess.

Have fun playing your N64 games over and over then. At least WW still looks good today. ;)



JazzB1987 on 05 February 2015
Samus Aran said:
LipeJJ said:

MM3D easily. The game is already tracking better on pre-orders than OoT3D's FW in the US. ALBW was the game nobody wanted, except loyal and oldschool fans.

It's still a far better game than OoT ever will be. Gamers are so predictable, the first in a series is always the best. In reality, they're almost always the worst.

The NES Zeldas are the worst 2D Zeldas and the N64 Zeldas are the worst 3D ones as far as I'm concerned.


TBH TP is far worse than OOT. 

And I dont think that a game that consists of 90% the same world as another game can be "better" than OOT.

I dont like the rental system at all because it serves no purpose when you can also buy the items or well buying serves no purpose when you dont die (I didnt )It removes the "treasure hunting/reward" aspect from the dungeons. All that is left is work you HAVE TO do to progress. The items were a reward for doing this.

Give me additional stuff to buy that helps me or let me buy a house like in animal crossing or whatever. But donjt force me to buy weapons. Much like SS this is just some arbitrary random purpose answer to the"what the hell are rupees supposed to do in this game? "-question.

TP had that nonsensical rupee eating armor. SS had annoying repairs and ALBW has that stupid rental system.

The thing that is good about ALBW is the "dungeons in any order"-mechanic.

Zelda 1 also allowed you to enter dungeons in any order but still rewarded you with items for going into those dungeons.



Samus Aran on 05 February 2015
JazzB1987 said:
Samus Aran said:

It's still a far better game than OoT ever will be. Gamers are so predictable, the first in a series is always the best. In reality, they're almost always the worst.

The NES Zeldas are the worst 2D Zeldas and the N64 Zeldas are the worst 3D ones as far as I'm concerned.


TBH TP is far worse than OOT. 

And I dont think that a game that consists of 90% the same world as another game can be "better" than OOT.

I dont like the rental system at all because it serves no purpose when you can also buy the items or well buying serves no purpose when you dont die (I didnt )It removes the "treasure hunting/reward" aspect from the dungeons. All that is left is work you HAVE TO do to progress. The items were a reward for doing this.

Give me additional stuff to buy that helps me or let me buy a house like in animal crossing or whatever. But donjt force me to buy weapons. Much like SS this is just some arbitrary random purpose answer to the"what the hell are rupees supposed to do in this game? "-question.

TP had that nonsensical rupee eating armor. SS had annoying repairs and ALBW has that stupid rental system.

The thing that is good about ALBW is the "dungeons in any order"-mechanic.

Zelda 1 also allowed you to enter dungeons in any order but still rewarded you with items for going into those dungeons.

No, TP is far better than OoT.
OoT is the most boring overworld I've ever seen in a game. And the artstyle and combat is downright terrible. Same goes for the bosses.



LordPhil on 05 February 2015

MM3D will almost certainly have a better FW, the rest will depend on its legs. It's already tracking higher than ALBW on COMG during the same timeframe and has been consistently in the top 10 on Amazon. It just seems to have more momentum atm.