I was hoping that they would have found a way to add 4 player co op. Something like a Horde mode. I thought that would have been a lot of fun.

Who here has said the lack of these features makes the whole game "shit"?

can't disagree more.  if i picked up uncharted 4 and the only option was team death match i would never play the multiplayer even though that's my favorite mode.  the various modes are what add new gameplay to a game.  yes, gameplay, the thing nintendo fans value above all else.  capture the flag is a different gameplay from team death match,.. team vs. team is differnt from an all-for-one is different from team vs. bots.   this variety is what makes a game fun for longer than just a bit ergo making the game more appealing.

...and it's not like it would be hard to not fracture the userbase and still ofter a variety of gameplay options if the concern is the community will be smallish.   have multiple game modes but have the only player option be a "playlist".   i'm not a creative person but it took me all 5 seconds to think of the idea that the first game could be based on territory capture and the next game be based on "kills",.. one game is 4 vs 4 and the next 2 vs 2 vs 2 vs 2.  i mean, i'm not wrong in thinking that idea is blatantly obvious.   ..or am i just a fucking genius here?

not rushed.  lazy.  nintendo.

All-Stars was a blatant copy of Smash. Of course people compared it with Smash. 

Splatoon is a very unique game with no obvious draft. 

Not rushed. Like others said, just the usual Nintendo decisions

You just mentioend preatty much all things why COD sucks, well the game itself aswell, but the community is horrendous, i dont get it, if you want to chat just have skype or something, stop being naive

Nintendo never does online right. NEVER. It's kinda killing me inside because it's sort of a standard. Always loved Nintendo, just wish they'd pay attention to the times once in a while. That would make their games that much more epic than they already are. I just found that this is due to certain staff members that don't want to change their mindsets from 1992. It's sad really.

No. Nintendo just really doesn't like features since they still think that they need to protect children from online hate and such.

It's not that it is necessary but it sure doesn't hurt. If anything it only helps. Having standard online features is something that NIntendo should have pioneered. But instead, their faculty wants to stay 20 years in the past. Their games are fun as hell, don't get me wrong and that's all that SHOULD matter, but in a world where gaming is constantly changing and new standards are being set, you can't afford to work against them. It's like Nintendo not wanting to adapt CDs or DVDs as a storage medium. It wasn't really great at first but then they became standards in the industry. That eventually cost Nintendo the 5th and 6th generations.No, this may not seem as revolutionary now but Nintendo better hop on soon with online. Heck, the world is going online.