Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the translation of the whole thing not complete?
"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't the translation of the whole thing not complete?
"I think it will be the HDS"-Me in regards to Nintendo's next handheld.
I find people bummed over just one mode being potentially available funny since COD is literally 75%-90% Team Deathmatch. A game could survive with one mode if it is successful enough with that mode. Not defending the choice if that is what they do as more modes is always better, but just making a point it doesn't make the game garbage.
Shortiloe said:
1vs1 were already confirmed in the last Direct (or daily Screenshots, one of them). Also, focusing on 4vs4 doesn't mean there are no other modes. Translations are not 100%. Smash bros has also no Voice chat. Does that mean it was rushed? |
Read the opening post again. Most if not all online shooters at this age have voice chat for randon online matches. Splatoon, being a shooter that also offers online and was first marketed at E3 booths with its online multiplayer, is being bought for its online multiplayer. To lack features that other games in its genre has at this time of the gaming industry could mean its rushed.
@Bold: Smash Bros isn't an online shooter.
The options do seem pretty barebones, but given that it's Nintendo, I doubt it's rushed. I think it's more likely that they wanted to limit how much they invested in an unproven ip. Hopefully it will have some decent dlc if the game is popular enough.
KingdomHeartsFan said:
I'm assuming you bought advanced warfare because the guns shot lasers for the first time and that's something new. So how do you like advanced warfare? |
No, I didn't. I don't own any CoDs. I have played them when at friends houses, but never owned any.
[Switch Friend code: 3909-3991-4970]
[Xbox Live: JissuWolfe]
[PSN: Jissu]
chapset said:
think the opposite, you are playing a 4v4 game, one guy quit, wouldn't you want this guy to be replaced with an other player or do you rather play 3v4, I know this used to be a major problem in online games like Halo back in 2006 |
What Nintendo often does with these games, at least for random matchups, is discreetly replaces the missing player with a bot. You get maybe 10, 20 seconds of lag, then suddenly one of the players runs very differently (painfully obvious in Smash, harder to spot in Mario Kart, since Kart's easier on lag). So they say "no bots", but that really means "matches will not start with bots."
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
padib said:
As we explained earlier, it would be naive if those modes did not split the playerbase. There is a fundamental reason for this design choice and you're just ignoring it rather than addressing it. |
It wouldn't split the userbase if all matches aren't forced to 4 versus 4. Why not allow 3 vs 3 or lower if its too difficult to find 8 players for 4 vs 4? And why not include bots in 4 versus 4?
padib said:
The last COD game I played only allowed you to join an existing team between two matchups. That was Black Ops. I don't think this ruined my enjoyment of the game in the slightest. Most majore fps games today are also not cartoony. Nintendo need not do what others do it's not make or break, those are features. And many very popular games today don't allow jumping in mid-game, a great example is league of Legends. |
And every day if you go in the leugue reddit you will see people complain about it and players actually get punished if they quit to many games. If you like paying full price for a game with limited features more power to you but seing those news I think you'll be enjoying long queue times and a lot of uneven games.
Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.
padib said:
Smash also allows for team matches online, where communication has largely the same considerations. |
But Smash isn't being bought primarily for its online multiplayer. Splatoon is and this is evident in how the demos at E3 and at Apex last month consists of nothing but online multiplayer.
padib said:
It's not an issue in League, why should it be an issue here? |
It's not even the same type of games, and people bitch and moan everyday on reddit about that, there's a reason why you get a surrender button at 20 min and you can get banned for leaving to many games.
Bet reminder: I bet with Tboned51 that Splatoon won't reach the 1 million shipped mark by the end of 2015. I win if he loses and I lose if I lost.