JoeAncelotti said:
generic-user-1 said:
JoeAncelotti said:
generic-user-1 said:
JoeAncelotti said: No, still too many boring old men in politics and as big leaders. Also there's still a difference in salary between a man and a woman with the same function. |
thats not true.. no study found a meaningfull difference between male and female payment if they count in everything. its just a lie that women get payed less for the same work. thinking that women get payd 20% less or more for the same job is just stupid. no person who worked a real job can taking this argument without laughing out loud. the most people dont get to argue about payment, they get payed the same like every other person thats doing the same job, there is just no way you could pay a female worker less than a male, the unions would sue you till your company is gone. |
Hmm, well I've seen different studies then.
|
there are so much bad studys out there... its cheap and all of those genderstudys majors have to do something for their masters thesis and peer-review doesnt work so well if the whole profession cant do simple math... but go on, link studys |
Man, I don't have those links ready. It's probably better right now though with the wages. But you were talking about the unions, how does that work? Because I live in the Netherlands and we do have groups that make sure workers get rights, but I'm sure there's a way to pay a woman less than a man here, because we've had big heads of banks get €100.000 when they were fired even though they didn't do a proper job.
|
if the head of a bank just gets 100k when he is fired the system works, 100m are more like the norm...
and there is no way you can pay a women less if the union and the companys talk about the wages(normal for the most workers).
if you have to talk with your boss about your wage, its your own fault if you get payed less than the others(but those people normaly make a lot more than the rest of the work force so its not realy important)