I guess...to each their own, then. Although, I think it's very difficult to call a turn based battle system exhilerating. However, I totally understand why the other games you listed could be.

I'm not wrong because you say so, look at Gardevoir's and specially Suicune's styles, mostly projectiles, do an insane amount of damage, you can't just ''write a line of code and make phase change its own mode'' wish worked that way, we would have 50 releases by studio per year, but i'm not gonna talk about that, they should just focus on what they're doing, the way they're doing it

Is it the same people who make the naruto games? The gameplay looks exactly like the ultimate naruto series...

Even the support pokemon..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-WqRkiLe1A

0:14-0:16, 0:38-0:42 non traditional camera

0:41-0:43, The direction that Machamp attacks and then Lucario forces him into with it's own attacks are cannot be mapped on a single axis.

Varies moments in the video you seem them on the dirt path and it seems 2D (0:44-0:46), other times they'll be off or even parrallel to it.

That stuff alone is enough to know that it's 3D (Tekken, but way less restrictive in movement) and not 2D (Smash). Toss in the crazy high jumps like 0:18 and arial attacks like 0:50 and it looks less and less like a Tekken game. Once the devs started talking about barrier for entry, it just became obvious. But whatever. It was obvious to me but not to others I guess. 

and this will never leave japan

The visuals and effects looks fantastic but the gameplay looks eerily similar to the Storm games which are cool but fail to have sort of depth to gameplay which worries me about this game.

A little bit of faith !!! I think is very possible, WiiU need this NOW xD

Now it seems kinda redundant to cram so many Pokemon into Smash 4...

I've seen them. You're exadurating. Their projectiles do no more damage than projectiles in other fighting games, at all. You're not wrong because I say so, you're wrong because the things you are saying is incorrect. It would not be a waste of time. It's already in the game. They wouldn't need do any large amount of work at all for something like that, or else we'd have only 1 release by a studio per 50 years. And yes, I'm exadurating ironically.

There's nothing about simply, and it is extremely simple to do, adding the option for 2D only battles, in a game that already has 2D battles, that stops them from "just focusing on what they're doing, the way they're doing it."

And I think it's difficult to take anyone who says that seriously. Turn based games are exhilerating for the same reasons that games like poker, chess, or any game where the strategy involves taking turns and reading your opponent, are exhilerating. They are games that require deep intellect, patience, and foresight to enjoy. Knowing that you outsmarted someone and reacted accordingly is exhilerating.