McDonaldsGuy said:
SanAndreasX said: The only thing I agree with is Xbox Live. The rest are not innovations. |
Which console had a hard drive standard before Xbox? Which console had triple A WRPGs before the Xbox? Which console had achievements? Which console had a killer first person shooter with online play? I may have stretched a bit with Gears though.
|
The lone true innovation I see here is HDDs, and I wouldn't say MS innovated there. Sony did have a HDD for PS2. There wasn't really a need for a HDD on sixth-generation consoles. Console makers have always been looking at mass-storage solutions, and as another poster said below, HDDs were cheap enough by 2006 that Sony would have included one in the PS3 anyway.
The rest of it is inconsequential. Achievements are for measuring e-penis length only, and a six-digit Gamerscore is more a testament to your Gamefly habits than your skill at gaming.
There have always been Western RPGs on consoles. People simply chose the Eastern stuff. Tastes were simply different at the time. SNES owners could have chosen Ultima or Wizardry over Final Fantasy VI, PS1 owners Diablo over FFVII, PS2 owners Baldur's Gate: DA, Summoner, or Fallout Tactics over games like FFX or Dragon Quest VIII. But they didn't. And frankly, I'm not impressed with Bioware or Bethesda beyond Fallout 3/New Vegas. And what about Sony having the first big console MMORPG in Final Fantasy XI?
I could also argue that FPSs got kicked off on consoles with Goldeneye on the N64, which was multiplayer and hugely popular. But I don't think one genre of game gaining supremacy over another necessarily counts as "innovation". That's just the pendulum swinging as it always does.