Ruler said: well china is atheist so its fair imo |
I'm pretty sure a country can't have a religion :p
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
Ruler said: well china is atheist so its fair imo |
I'm pretty sure a country can't have a religion :p
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
Samus Aran said:
Christmas for example. :p The Christmas tree as well. |
Those I already knew ^^
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
badgenome said:
Well, they may be atheists but I think we both know that the state religion is actually political correctness. That's why a Christian preacher who denounces homosexuality runs the risk of prosecution for hate speech in Sweden while an imam who does the same is going to be left alone. |
Indeed, and I think we're seeing a backlash to that now, for better or worse...
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
Lafiel said:
the problem is that burqas and niqabs are used as everyday clothing and refused to remove anywhere else than at home / as long as strangers are present |
Male strangers.
OT: I don't think I agree with this. I feel like people should be able to do whatever they want unless it's causing harm. Even though I really hate those things and wish women would stop wearing them.
Edit: Also, they do reveal their faces whenever authoroties ask them to.
DanneSandin said: Indeed, and I think we're seeing a backlash to that now, for better or worse... |
It's hard to say which. While I'm glad to see a pushback at long last, these things usually go from one extreme to the other.
What the hell? Hijabs too? I understand the niqabs. But how is a hijab any worse than a hat or something? Banning this in a place with half Muslim population? Yeah that'll go well
Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out
Ps4:110million
Xbox one :75 million( was 65)
Wii u: 20 milliion
padib said:
It's okay, you sound fine. I think that for every sick verse you will find a noble one. As for Lot's action, I'm not willing to excuse it, and I'm not sure the bible excuses all actions that are described in it either. Lot may have been a righteous man, but so was David, and he took Uriah's wife in adultery with him, and had Uriah killed in the battlefield. So being righteous doesn't excuse all your actions. Perhaps Lot's intention was noble but his actions were less. He may have intended to forbid a holy angel of God to be defiled, but perhaps his approach was wrong. It is difficult to judge since we don't know if there is a different offense between raping an angel and raping a human. It's a sick question, but let's remember the people in that land were sexually perverted. |
Oh goodie ^^
Well, just because there is a good verse for every evil verse doesn't make the Bible a moraly right and good book. I mean, Hitler did some good things for Germany before he started WWII. Does that mean we could/should just forget all the (very) bad things he did? The same thing can probably be said about Stalin.
Going by Lot's actions, he was far from a good man, far from a good morale example. We could even take a look at God himself and deduce that it's a jealous and moraly corrupt God. What did he do to the first borns of Egypt when ONE Egytian refused to let the Jews go? He murdered a whole generation of innocent children. If that isn't sick, I don't know what is. With ll his might there would have been thousands of other ways to convince the Pharao to let the Jews go.
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
Good, more country's should follow in, we don't need to see any of those shits.
User was moderated for this post and others.
--Veknoid_Outcast
Lafiel said:
the problem is that burqas and niqabs are used as everyday clothing and refused to remove anywhere else than at home / as long as strangers are present |
But wouldn't it make more sense to ban all the masking of the face? Not just burqas? No, as it is, they're targeting peoples religion and culture, and for no good reason. This way, anyone could walk around with a ski mask on, and it wouldn't be illegal, when that's the kind of practice they SHOULD gop after
I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!
Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.
I've always wanted to know why people were so adamant about banning the burqa or other muslim garb? Do they feel that if they ban it terrorism will stop and they'll be safer? Muslim terrorist who commit their crimes in western countries aren't wearing burqa's or other religious garb because it draws too much attention. They wear regular clothes you and I would be wearing to not draw attention.
Banning of religious garb is plain stupid in my opinion because it's targeting muslims who don't commit crimes. For example, i'm anti gun BUT I refuse to ever support a ban against guns because it's targeting the majority of gun owners who are upstanding citizens.
We've let the global media paint this picture that muslims are evil terrorist. The media wants us to be distracted by things like this while they cut deals behind the scenes and steal the wealth. I refuse to ever hate muslims for the acts of a very few bad apples because i'm not an evil person.